Were differences in tactical efficacy between the winners and losers teams and the final classification in the 2003 water polo World Championship?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2009.42.07Keywords:
Water polo, Efficacy, Winner, LoserAbstract
This study has pursued to find the efficacy values in the playing micro-situations with or without ball possession present in Water polo and to analyze the relation between these and the condition of winner or loser, among winning teams, among losing teams and for the position that dealt in the final classification of the X World Championship. Were recorded in video all the female and male matches of the X Water polo World Championship, out agreed by consensus between two trained specialists, continuing the directors of the observational methodology. A specific software was designed for the analysis of the images and the management of the information. Has evaluated by means of coefficients the playing micro-situations in numerical equality, counterattack, defensive adjustment, simple temporary numerical inequality and penalty; obtaining efficacy values. For the statistically data analysis was carried out an ANOVA of a single factor followed by the Tukey test, taking as reference a value of p≤.05. To conclude with, say that significant differences have been revealed in thirty six efficacy values in female category and forty six in male between winning and losing teams, eight between winning teams, the same ones between losing teams and seventeen between the positions that dealt in the final classification on having finished the above mentioned championship.
Downloads
References
Anguera M.T., et al. La metodología observacional en el deporte: conceptos básicos. Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes, Revista Digital [en línea], 2000; 24. Extraído el 5 de octubre, 2004 de: http://www.efdeportes.com/efd24b/obs.htm
Anguera M.T. Diseños observacionales en la actividad física y el deporte: estructura, alcance y nuevas perspectivas. Ponencia presentada en el II Congreso Mundial de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, Granada, España; 2003.
Argudo F. Modelo de evaluación táctica en deportes de oposición con colaboración. Estudio práxico del Waterpolo. Tesis Doctoral. Universitat de Valencia; 2000.
Argudo F. Táctica deportiva: entrenamiento, evaluación y planificación. En Programme du colloque de praxéologie motrice : “Motricités, savoirs et valeurs”. Sorbonne, París, Francia; 2002.
Argudo F. Conceptos, contenidos y evaluación táctica en Waterpolo. UCAM: Murcia; 2005.
Argudo F., Alonso J.I., Fuentes F. Computerized registration for tactical quantitative evaluation in water polo. Polo partido v1.0. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium Computer Science in Sport. Croatia; 2005.
Argudo F., Lloret M. Coeficientes de eficacia ofensiva y defensiva en igualdad numérica en Waterpolo femenino en Sevilla-97. Agua y Gestión. 1998a; 42:16-30.
Argudo F., Lloret M. Coeficientes de eficacia ofensiva y defensiva en Waterpolo masculino. Comunicaciones Técnicas. 1998b; 6:41-56.
Argudo F., Lloret M. Coeficientes de eficacia ofensiva y defensiva en Waterpolo femenino. Comunicaciones Técnicas. 1999; 2:45-67.
Argudo F., Lloret M. Investigación en Waterpolo (1990-2003). Murcia: Diego Marín; 2007.
Canossa S., Garganta J., Lloret M. Estudo do processo ofensivo em selecções femininas de polo aquático participantes no campeonato europeu de Sevilha 1997. Estudos 3 – CEFD. Porto: FCDEF-UP; 2002.
Carreiro J.P. A Formação em Pólo Aquático. Coeficientes de eficácia e quantificação táctica do jogo. Dissertação apresentada com vista à obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Gestão da Formação Desportiva (não publicado). FMH – UTL. Lisboa; 2002.
Gayoso F. Fundamentos de táctica deportiva. Madrid: Gayoso, F. Ed; 1983.
Kioumortzoglou E., Kourtessis T., Michalopoulo M., Derri V. Expertise in Water-Polo. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1997; 33:205-228.
Lloret M. Análisis de la acción de juego en el Waterpolo durante la Olimpiada de 1992. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Barcelona; 1994.
lloret M. Análisis praxiológico del Waterpolo. Revista de Entrenamiento Deportivo. 1995; VIII (2):28-36.
Lloret M. Los coeficientes ofensivos y defensivos, una aportación al estudio práxico de los deportes de equipo. Apunts. 1999; 55:68-76.
Platanou T. Analysis of the extra man in water polo: a comparison between winning and losing teams and players of different playing position. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2004a; 46:205-211.
Platanou T. Time-Motion Analysis of International Level Water Polo Players. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2004b; 46:319-331.
Sarmento J. Análise das acçoes ofensivas. Horizonte. 1991; 45(7):88-91.
Sarmento J. O Jogo e o Jogador de Polo Aquático Português. Tese de Doutoramento. FCDEF – UP; 1994.
Sarmento J., Magalhaes L. Determinaçao de coeficientes para a valorizaçao da observaçao do ataque em pólo aquático. Nataçao. 1991; 13(4):7-8.
Takagi H., Nishijima T., Enomoto I., Steward A.M. Determining factors of game performance in the 2001 World Water Polo Championships. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2005; 49:333-352.
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
