Standing long jump and handheld halters: Is jumping performance improved?

Authors

  • Christos Papadopoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • George Noussios Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Evaggelos Manolopoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Olga Kiritsi Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • George Ntones Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Evangelia Gantiraga Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Ioannis Gissis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2011.62.24

Keywords:

Standing long jump, Halters, Jumping distance

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to document the kinematic and dynamic characteristics of the standing long jump without extra loading and with handheld weights (halters) of different mass and to investigate any association between the former and jumpers' performance. Fifteen subjects (13 males and 2 females) between the ages of 19 and 21 years old participated in this horizontal prospective study. Each participant performed standing long jumps. Regarding the jumping technique, free arm swinging without or with handheld halters of different weights (1.5 kg and 3 kg in each hand) was used. The subjects repeated the jumping set (consisted of free arm swinging jump, jumping with 3 kg and then with 6 kg handheld halters) three times and the three different technique jumps were performed in a random order. The jumping distance was significantly increased 7 cm (2.7%) with 3 kg handheld halters compared to free arm jumps (p=0.006). In addition the subjects jumped 5 cm further with 6 kg handheld weights (2.67±0.27 m) than without (2.62±0.21 m) (statistically significant difference, p=0.005). The horizontal displacement of the center of mass was significantly increased with 3 kg and 6 kg handheld compared to free arm jumps (p=0.007, p=0.005 respectively). Take off angle of center of mass difference was statistically significant between 0 kg (36±5º) and 6 kg (29±5º) handheld weights (12.13% decrease, p=0.001). A gradual significant increase in the horizontal take off velocity of the center of mass was depicted between free arm and 3 kg halters jump (3.5% increase) and 3 kg weights and 6 kg ones (3.69% increase). In conclusion greater distance is achievable during a loaded standing long jump due to 1) horizontal translation of the center of mass, 2) the greater ground reaction force that is generated, 3) decrease in take off angle of center of mass and 4) increase in the horizontal take off velocity of the center of mass.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguado, X., Izquierdo, M., Montesinos, J.L. Kinematic and kinetic factors related to the standing long jump performance. J Hum Movement Stud. 1997; 32:157-169.

Ariel, G.B. The Ariel Performance Analysis System. 1990; SPIE. 1356:76-78. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.23886

Ashby, B.M. & Delp, S.L. Optimal control simulations reveal mechanisms by which arm movement improves standing long jump performance. J Biomech. 2006; 39(9):1726-1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.017

Ashby, B.M. & Heegaard, J.H. Role of arm motion in the standing long jump. J Biomech. 2002; 35: 1631-1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00239-7

Ashby, B.M. Optimal control simulations demonstrate how using halters (hand-held weights) can increase standing long jump performance. XXth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics and 29th Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, July 32-August 5, 2005; Cleveland, OH, http://www.exponent.com.

Butcher, M.T. & Bertram, J.E.A. Jump distance increases while carrying handheld weights: Impulse, history, and jump performance in a simple lab exercise. J Scie Education Technol.2004; 33: 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031267.98644.98

Ebert, J. Der Pentathlonsprung. Abh. Sochs. Akad. Wiss. Philo-Hisot. Klasse. 1963; 56:35-65.

Hay, J.G. Citius, altius, longius (faster, higher, longer): The biomechanics of jumping for distance. J Biomech. 1993; 26 (1): 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90076-Q

Horita, T., Kitamura, K., Kohmo, N. Body configuration and joint moment analysis during standing long jump in 6-yr-old children and adult males. Medi Scie Sports Exer. 1991; 23: 1068-1077. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199109000-00012

Lenoir, M., De Clercq, D., Laporte, W. The "how" and "why" of the ancient Greek long jump with weights. A five-fold symmetric jump in a row? J Sports Scie. 2005; 23: 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400022037

Linthorne, N., Guzman, M., Bridgett, L. Optimum take-off angle in the long jump. J Sports Scie. 2005; 23:703-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400022011

Minetti, A. & Ardigo, L. Halters used in ancient Olympic long Jump. Nature. 2002; 420 (69):141-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/420141a

Tasch, P. Conservation of momentum in antiquity: A note on the prehistory of the principle of jet propulsion. Isis.1952; 43:251-252. https://doi.org/10.1086/348113

Thaller, S., Sust, M., Tilp, M. Individual effects of additional weights used in ancient Greek Olympic pentathlon. (Abstract) 8th ECSS Congress, 2003; Salsburg, pp 387.

Wakai, M. & Linthorne, N.P. Optimum take-off angle in the standing long jump. Hum Movement Sci. 2005; 24(1): 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2004.12.001

Ward-Smith, A.J. The application of modern methods of biomechanics to the evaluation of jumping performance in ancient Greece. J Sports Sci. 1995; 13: 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419508732231

Statistics

Statistics RUA

How to Cite

Papadopoulos, C., Noussios, G., Manolopoulos, E., Kiritsi, O., Ntones, G., Gantiraga, E., & Gissis, I. (2011). Standing long jump and handheld halters: Is jumping performance improved?. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 6(2), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2011.62.24

Issue

Section

Performance Analysis of Sport