Moneyball and soccer: An analysis of the key performance indicators of elite male soccer players by position
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.72.06Keywords:
Moneyball, Soccer, Key performance indicators, Elite male, PositionAbstract
In most sports, it is found that the important performance indicators (PI’s) vary from coach to coach. Therefore, if sets of PI’s can be identified and clear operational definitions defined, there is significant scope/benefit for consultancy and research, particularly in commercially orientated sports such as soccer. The aim of this study was to use the unique opportunity of a large number of performance analysts coming together to discuss this problem and its application to soccer, and define sets of performance indicators for each position in soccer. In the early spring of 2011, staff from 9 universities, from all over Europe, brought 51 level 3 Sports Science students to Hungary for an Intensive Programme in Performance Analysis of Sport (IPPAS). The 15 staff, all experts in PA, had a total of over 200 years of experience of PA between them. The most experienced ‘experts’ (N=5) acted as mentors, introducing the area, defining the aims and managing the groups. The rest (N=10) and the 51 students were distributed evenly as possible across 7 groups, in which their aim was to define the key PI’s for one of the positions in soccer. The positions used were:- Goalkeepers; Full Backs; Centre Backs; Holding Midfield; Attacking Midfield; Wide Midfield and Strikers. In conclusion, 7 sets of KPI’S, were defined for each of these classifications within 5 category sets: Physiological, Tactical, Technical - Defending,Technical - Attacking, and Psychological. These KPI’s were different from position to position within the team, particularly for the Goal Keeper. The KPI’s for the outfield players were very similar, differing only in their order of importance. This enabled a ‘generic’ set of skills required for outfield players in soccer.Downloads
References
Cook, M. Soccer Coaching and Team Management. E.P. Publishing Ltd: Leeds; 1982.
Dufour, W. Computer-assisted scouting in soccer. In T. Reilly, J. Clarys, A. Stibble (Eds.). Science and Football II. London: E. & F.N. Spon; 1993, pp.160-166.
Franks, I.M. Use of feedback by coaches and players. In T. Reilly, J. Bangsbo, M. Hughes (Eds.). Science and Football III. London: E. & F.N. Spon; 1997, pp. 267-278.
Franks, I.M., Goodman, D. A systematic approach to analysing sports performance. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1986; 4:49-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418608732098
Franks, I.M., Mcgarry, T. The science of match analysis. In T. Reilly (Ed.). Science and Soccer. London: E&FN Spon; 1996, pp. 363-375.
Garganta, J. Tactical modelling in soccer: a critical view. In M. Hughes, F. Tavares (Eds.). Notational Analysis of Sport IV. Porto; Centre for team sports studies; 1998, pp. 58-64.
Hughes, M.D. Notational Analysis of Soccer. In T. Reilly (Ed.). Science and Soccer II. London: E. & F.N. Spon; 2004, pp. 245-264.
Hughes, M., Bartlett, R. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. Journal of Sports Science. 2002; 20:739-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320675602
Hughes, M.D., Franks, I.M. Notational Analysis of Sport 2nd Edition-better systems for improving coaching and performance. London: E. & F.N. Spon; 2004.
Hughes, M., Meyers, R. Movement patterns in elite men's singles tennis. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2005; 5(2):110-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2005.11868331
Hughes, M., Probert, G. A technical analysis of elite male soccer players by position and success . In H. Dancs, M. Hughes, P. O'Donoghue. (Eds.). Notational Analysis of Sport -VII, Cardiff: UWIC; 2006, pp. 76-91.
Lewis, M. Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. USA: W. W. Norton & Co; 2003.
Luhtanen, P.H. Reliability of video observation of individual techniques used in soccer. In T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davids, W. J. Murphy. Science and Football. London: E. & F.N. Spon; 1988, pp. 356-360.
Partridge, D., Mosher, R.E., Franks, I.M. A computer assisted analysis of technical performance-a comparison of the 1990 world cup and intercollegiate soccer. In T. Reilly, J. Clarys, A. Stibble (Eds.). Science and Football II. London: E&FN Spon; 1993, pp.221-231.
Reilly, T., Holmes, M. A Preliminary analysis of selected soccer skills. Physical Education Review. 1983; 6(1):64-71.
Reilly, T., Thomas, V. A motion analysis of work-rate in different positional roles in professional football match play. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 1976; 2:87-97.
Smith, M. Success in Football. Butler and Tanner: London; 1973.
Van Lingen, B. Coaching Soccer. Reedswain, Spring City: USA; 1997.
Wiemeyer, J. Who should play in which position in soccer? Empirical evidence and unconventional modelling. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2003; 3(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2003.11868269
Williams, J.J. An investigation into operational definitions used within performance analysis. Presentation at the International Workshop in Performance Analysis, Lincoln, January; 2009.
Yamanaka, K., Liang, D.Y., Hughes, M. An analysis of the playing patterns of the Japan national team in the 1994 World Cup qualifying match for Asia. In T. Reilly, J. Bangsbo, M. Hughes (Eds.). Science and Football III. London: E&FN Spon; 1997, pp. 221-228.
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
