Factors influencing the choice of a university degree: The case of recreation, parks and tourism administration studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.73.08Keywords:
Academic major, Leisure and recreation, Situated learning, Distributed learningAbstract
The aim of this research is to analyze students´ expectations that have an influence on choosing Leisure and Recreation as an academic major. According to the analysis of this research on the reasons for choosing Recreation, Parks, and Tourism Administration studies at a university in the United States, the conclusions reached show that among multiple factors, the expectations of having collaborative and situated learning experiences are one of the main reasons for choosing these studies, as well as the job opportunities that this degree offers. The results of this research evidence the high degree of emotionality affecting this decision. The conclusions of this study may be useful for designing Leisure and Recreation curriculums.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J.R., GREENO, J.G., REDER, L.M. and SIMON, H.A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 229 (4), 11-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029004011
BROOKES, M. (2003). Evaluating the 'Student Experience': An Approach to Managing and Enhancing Quality in Higher Education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 2(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.21.27
BROWN, J. S., COLLINS,A. and DUGUID, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities. In A. Iran-Nejad and P.D. Pearson, Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-306.
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S.L. (2011). Changing Perspectives on Practitioner Research. Learning Landscapes, 4(2), 17-23.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, Emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann.
DARLING-HAMMOND, L. (1996) The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 6, 5-17. 1996. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025006005
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
DUNBAR, R. and SHULTZ, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317, 1344-1347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145463
ECO, U. (2004). It's not what you know… The Guardian, 3 April, 7.
GLASER, B.G. and STRAUSS, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Aldine. 1967.
HOLLAND, J.L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist, 51(4), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.397
Huber, G. L. AQUAD Six. (2012). Manual for the Analysis of Qualitative data. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.
HUBER, G. L. (2008). Aprendizajes activos y metodologías educativas. Revista de Educación, número extraordinario, 59-81.
JAWITZ, J. (2009). Learning in the academic workplace: the harmonization of collective and the individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 34 (6), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802556149
JOHNSON, D.W. and JOHNSON, R.T. (2009). An Educational Psychology success story: interdependence Theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38 (5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Books.
King, M., Morison, I., Reed, G. and Stachow, G. (1999). Student Feedback Systems in the Business School: A Departmental Model. Quality Assurance in Education 7(2): 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889910269588
Koch, C. (2012). How Physics and Neuroscience Dictate Your "Free" Will. Scientific American, April 12.
KOHLER, E., KEYSERS, C., UMILTÀ, M. A., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V. and RIZZOLATTI, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846-848. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070311
KRUMBOLTZ, J.D. and WORTHINGTON, R.L. (1999). The School to Work Transition from a Learning Theory Perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00740.x
KRUMBOLTZ, J.D., MITCHELL, A.M., and JONES, G.B. (1976). A social learning theory of career selection. The Counseling Psychologist, 6(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/001100007600600117
Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In J. A. Banks and C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Hand-book of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 50-65). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
LAVE, J. and WENGER, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
LEHER, J. (2012). Why We Don't Believe In Science. The New Yorker, June 7.
LIEBERMAN, A. and POINTER-MACE, D. H. (2008). Teacher Learning: the key to Educational Reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, (3)226-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108317020
Martínez, M. A. and Sauleda, N. (2001). Interdependencia entre las concepciones sobre el aprendizaje y la mente en el escenario de las perspectivas colaborativas de la educación. In E. Tonda and A. Mula (Eds.) Scripta in Memoriam (pp. 235-254). Alicante: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.
MARTÍNEZ, M. A., SAULEDA, N. and HUBER, G. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What pictures want? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Millis, B. and Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative Learning for higher education faculty. New York: ACE Oryx.
MIRSAFIAN, H. and MOHAMADINEJAD, A. (2012). Sport volunteerism: a study on volunteering motivations in university. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 7 (1)Proc, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.7.Proc1.09
PLUMTON, C. (2005). An exploration of factors involved in choosing recreation as an academic major. Thesis Master of Arts. University of Manitoba. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(03), (AAT MR08939).
Putnan, R.T. and Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
RAYMORE, L.A, and BERNO, T. (1996). Undergraduate Parks, Recreation, and Leisure Education: Variables Associated With Recruitment and Implications For Retention. Schole: A journal of leisure studies and recreation education, 10, 35-43.
Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
Rizzolati, G. and Sinigaglia, C. (2006). Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions an Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ROSENFIELD, I. and ZIFF, E. (2008). How the Mind Works: Revelations. The New York Review of Book. LV, 11, 62-65.
ROTH, W.M. (1995). Authenctic school science. Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1
ROTH, W.M. (1998). Designing Communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer A. P. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5562-5
STIEGLER, B. (2012). La formation de la nouvelle raison: Sept proposition pour l'ecole. In D. Kambonahner, P. Meirien and B. Stiegler, L'école, le numérique et la societé qui vient. Paris: Mille et une nuits.
Super, D.E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd Ed.) (pp.89-97). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
TVERSKY, A. and KAHNEMAN, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Walker, M. (2006). Higher Education Pedagogies. Glasgow: McGraw Hill Education.
WHITCOMB, J., BORKO, H. and LISTON, D. (2009). Growing Talent. Promising Professional Development Models and Practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, (3)207-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109337280
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.