Effects of randomization versus pre-orientation of subjects for the prediction of maximum oxygen uptake using the twelve minutes run test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.83.08Keywords:
Field test, Performance, Peer relationshipAbstract
Aim: To compare the results from twelve minutes run test (12-MRT) when subjects run singly with those obtained when subjects run in randomized groups and in pre oriented groups. Methods: 33 subjects performed the 12-MRT in four variants: Achieving alone the 12-MRT on a 400 m track (Alone); Achieving in randomised groups of three the 12-MRT on a 400 m track (Group); Achieving in preoriented groups of three the 12-MRT on a 400 m track (PO-Group); Completing alone the 12-MRT on a 200 m tract (Half-Track). At the end of each test, the rate of perceived exertion was determined. Results: No significant difference (p>0.05) was found in predicted VO2max between tests. RPE was significantly higher during PO-Group compared to Alone. Underperforming athletes elicited an underestimation of predicted VO2max in Alone more important to PO-Group (12.1%) compared to Group (8%). No change of predicted VO2max was observed in the middle athletes between Alone, Group and PO-Group. For the fastest athletes, predicted VO2max was significantly lower (p<0.05) for PO-Group compared to Alone where as for the Group, predicted VO2max was higher (p<0.05) compared to Alone. Conclusion: These results suggest that prediction of VO2max using the 12-MRT is influenced by peer relationship and the training status of athletes.Downloads
References
Assomo, P.B., Mandengue, S.H., Faye, J., Diop, M., Guessogo, M.R., Bâ, A., Cisse, F. & Etoundi-Ngoa, S.L. (2012). Analysis of psychological effects of the presence of peers and space perception during the performance of the twelve minutes run test (12-MRT) in estimating maximal oxygen consumption. Int J Perform Anal Sport, 12, pp.282-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2012.11868600
Balke, B. (1963). A simple test for the assessment of physical fitness. Oklahomo city, okla: Civil Aeromedical Research Institute, Federal Aviation Agency. CARI Rep, 63-6, pp.1-8.
Bath, D., Turner, L.A., Bosch, A.N., Tucker, R., Lambert, E.V., Thompson, K.G. & St Clair Gibson, A. (2012). The effect of a second runner on pacing strategy and RPE during a running time trial. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 7, pp,26-32. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.7.1.26
Besier, T.F., Lloyd, D.G. & Ackland, T.R. (2003). Muscle activation strategies at the knee during running and cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 35, pp.119-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200301000-00019
Cafarelli, E. (1992). Peripheral contributions to the perception of effort. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 14, pp.382-389.
Cooper, K.H. (1968). A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake: correlations between field and tredmill testing. Jama, 203, pp.201-204. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1968.03140030033008
Dean, E. (1996). Mobilization and exercise. In: Frownfelter D & Dean E (ed). Principles and practice of cardiopulmonary physical therapy. St Louis: Mo: Mosby, pp.265-298.
Grant, S., Corbett, K., Amjad, A.M., Wilson, J. & Aitchison, T. (1995). A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med, 29, pp.147-152. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.29.3.147
Hagberg, J.M. (1994). Exercise assessment of arthritic and elderly individuals. Clin Rheumatol, 8, pp.29-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3579(05)80223-7
Hulleman, M., De Koning, J.J., Hettinga, F.J. & Foster, C. (2007). The effect of extrinsic motivation on cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc., 39(4), pp.709-715. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31802eff36
Jowett, S. & Lavallee, D. (2008). Relations entre pairs dans le sport chez les jeunes. In : De Boeck (ed). Psychologie sociale du sport. Bruxelles, pp.45-60.
Marciniuk, D.D. & Gallagher, C.G. (1994). Clinical exercise testing in interstitial lung disease. Clin Chest Med., 15, pp.287-303.
Mauger, A.R., Jones, A.M. & Williams, C.A. (2011). The effect of non-contingent and accurate performance feedback on pacing and time trial performance in 4-km track cycling. Br J Sports Med., 45, pp.225-229. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.062844
Penry, J.T., Wilcox, A.R. & Yun, J. (2011). Validity and reliability analysis of cooper's 12-minute run and the multistage shuttle run in healthy adults. J Strength Cond Res., 25, pp.597-605. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2423
Perreault, S. & Vallerand, R.J. (1998). Coming from behind: on the effect of psychological momentum on sport performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol., 20, pp.421-436. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.4.421
Questead, K.A. & Alquist, A. (1994). Exercise assessment in clinical practice. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Am., 5, pp.243-253.
Robertson, R.J. (1982). Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic exercise. Med Sci Sport Exerc., 14, pp.390-396. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00014
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
