Email this article 
The effect of flexible flat-footedness on selected physical fitness factors in female students aged 14 to 17 years
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate influence of flexible foot flatness on several physical fitness factors that are necessary for sport performance. Fifty students were randomly selected from each group (Flatfoot and Normal group). Static balance (One Leg Test), Dynamic balance (Modified Bass Test), speed (45 Meter Dash Test) and agility (T Test) were selected as physical fitness factors. There were significant differences in agility and static balance records (P<0.05) but not significant differences in speed and dynamic balance records between groups (P>0.05). It seems foot as a last part of a close kinematic chain has very important role in dynamic and static position and affects physical fitness factors. However, owing to presence of a plenty of controversies suggests more works in this domain.
Keywords
References
Shih YF, Chen CY, Chen WY, Lin HC. Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2012; 13:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-31
Milenković S, Bubanj S, Živković D, Bubanj R, Purenović T, Obradović B, Dimić A, Bubanj M. Incidence Of Flat Foot In High School Students. Facta Universitatis. 2011; 9:275-281.
Bordelon RL. Hypermobile flatfoot in children. Comprehension, evaluation, and treatment. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1983; 7-14.
Kuhn DR, Shibley NJ, Austin WM, Yochum TR. Radiographic evaluation of weight-bearing orthotics and their effect on flexible pes planus. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 1999; 22:221-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(99)70048-5
Donatelli RA, Hurlburt C, Conaway D, St Pierre R. Biomechanical foot orthotics: a retrospective study. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 1988; 10:205-212. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1988.10.6.205
Highlander P, Sung W, Weil L, Jr. Subtalar arthroereisis. Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery. 2011; 28:745-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2011.08.004
Dennis KJ, Cooke RA, Valmassy RL, Weed JH. Biplane Posting Elevator. A new method of rearfoot post application. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 1985; 75:272-274. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-75-5-272
McCulloch MU, Brunt D, Vander Linden D. The effect of foot orthotics and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 1993; 17:2-10. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1993.17.1.2
Nawoczenski DA, Saltzman CL, Cook TM. The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rear foot. Physical therapy. 1998; 78:404-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.4.404
Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG. Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006; 21:175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.005
Tiberio Z. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: A theoretical model. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 1987; 9:160-165. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1987.9.4.160
Tudor A, Ruzic L, Sestan B, Sirola L, Prpic T. Flat-footedness is not a disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11 to 15 years. Pediatrics. 2009; 123:e386-392. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2262
Barry RJ, Scranton PE, Jr. Flat feet in children. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1983; 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198312000-00011
Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2001; 21:378-382. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-200105000-00022
Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2010; 4:107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-010-0239-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.83.03
