Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

Winning or not winning: The influence on coach-athlete relationships and goal achievement

Rui Trocado Mata, Antonio Rui da Silva Gomes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.84.09

Abstract

This study analyzes the relation between sports success and athletes’ perception of coaches’ leadership, athletes’ satisfaction with coaches’ leadership, coach-athlete compatibility, and goal achievement. Sixty-six athletes who qualified for the final Division I play-offs of a professional volleyball championship were grouped into winning (n = 21) and non-winning teams (n = 45). Leadership styles, satisfaction with leadership, coach-athlete compatibility, and goal achievement were evaluated. Analysis of variance with repeated-measures revealed that the winning teams evaluated their coaches’ vision, inspiration, technical coaching, positive feedback, and active management more positively than non-winning teams and that their satisfaction with coaches’ strategies increased over time. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated that the winning teams’ perceived achievement of personal and team goals was greater than that of the non-winning teams. Sports success was associated with athletes’ positive evaluation of coaches’ leadership, satisfaction with coaches’ strategy, and higher perceived goal attainment.


Keywords

Leadership; Coaching; satisfaction; Compatibility; Sports performance

References

BASS BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press; 1985.

BASS BM, RIGGIO RE. Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006.

BOARDLEY ID, KAVUSSANU M, RING C. Athletes' perceptions of coaching effectiveness and athlete-related outcomes in rugby union: An investigation based on the coaching efficacy model. The Sport Psychologist. 2008; 22: 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.22.3.269

CHELLADURAI P. Leadership in sports. In: G. Tenenbaum and R.C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (3rd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch5

Collins J. Good to great. New York: HarperCollins; 2001.

CORTINA JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993; 78: 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

COTE J, SALMELA JH, TRUDEL P, BARIA A, RUSSELL S. The coaching model: A grounded assessment of expert gymnastic coaches knowledge. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1995; 17: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.1

COURNEYA KS, CHELLADURAI P. A model of performance measures in baseball. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1991; 13: 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.13.1.16

CROCKER PRE, GRAHAM TR. Coping by competitive athletes with performance stress: Gender differences and relationships with affect. The Sport Psychologist. 1995; 9: 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.9.3.325

DAY DV, LORD RG. Executive leadership and organizational performance: Suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management. 1988; 14: 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400308

DEGROOT T, KICKER DS, CROSS C. A meta-analysis to review organisational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. 2000; 17(4): 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00234.x

DUMDUM UR, LOWE KB, AVOLIO BJ. A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In: B. J. Avolio and F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Oxford, U.K: JAI/Elsevier; 2002.

FELTZ DL, CHASE MA, MORITZ SE, SULLIVAN PJ. A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999; 91: 765-776. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.765

GOMES AR, PAIVA P. Liderança, compatibilidade treinador-atleta e satisfação no andebol: Percepção de atletas novatos e experientes [Leadership, coach-athlete compatibility and satisfaction in handball: Perceptions of novice and experienced athletes]. PsicoUSF. 2010; 15(2): 235-248.

GOMES AR, RESENDE R. Assessing leadership styles of coaches and testing the augmentation effect in sport. Sumitted for publication. 2012.

HARTER JK, SCHMIDT FL, HAYES TL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002; 87: 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

HETLAND H, SANDAL G. Transformational leadership in Norway: Outcomes and personality correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2003; 12(2): 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000057

Horn TS. Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In: T.S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008.

Jowett S. Interdependence analysis and the 3+1 Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. In: S. Jowett and D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007.

JOYCE WF, NOHRIA N, ROBERSON B. What really works. New York: Harper Business; 2003.

JUDGE TA, PICCOLO RF, ILIES R. The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004; 89: 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36

KAISER RB, HOGAN R, CRAIG SB. Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist. 2008; 63: 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.96

Kenow LJ, WILLIAMS JM. Coach-athlete compatibility and athlete's perception and evaluative reactions to coaching behaviors. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1999; 22: 251-259.

Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., Jonas, K., Quaquebeke, N. V. and van Dick, R. (2012), How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees' needs as mediating links. J. Organiz. Behav., 33: 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1771

Lyle J. Sports coaching concepts: A framework for coachesʼ behaviour. London: Routledge; 2002.

MALLETT C, CÔTÉ J. Beyond winning and losing: Guidelines for evaluating high performance coaches. The Sport Psychologist. 2006; 20: 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.20.2.213

MCGAHAN AM, PORTER ME. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal. 1997; 18: 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<15::AID-SMJ916>3.3.CO;2-T

PENSGAARD AM, DUDA JL. Sydney 2000: The interplay between emotions, coping, and the performance of Olympic-level athletes. The Sport Psychologist. 2003; 17: 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.17.3.253

Rai S, SINHA AK. Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and facilitating climate. Psychological Studies. 2000; 45(1-2): 33-42.

RIEMER HA, CHELLADURAI P. Development of the athlete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1998; 20: 127-156. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.2.127

Thomas A. Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance? Administrative Science Quarterly. 1998; 33: 388-400. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392715

WILLIAMS JM, JEROME GJ, KENOW LJ, ROGERS T, SARTAIN TA, DARLAND G. (2003). Factor structure of the coaching behavior questionnaire and its relationships to athlete variables. The Sport Psychologist. 2003; 17: 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.17.1.16




DOI: https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.84.09





Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.