Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

The acceptable level of risk-taking for traditional rock climbers

David Chaloupsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2014.9.Proc1.08

Abstract

Taking risk with all the consequences inevitably belongs to climbing. Each climber confronts his or her skills with the route he or she has chosen for an ascent. If the route is well protected, the rate of risk the climber takes is lower. If the route is less protected, the level of risk that the climber is exposed to proportionally increases. The aim of the research is to determine the level of risk-taking in traditional climbing on sandstone. We focus on how the level of risk affects climber’s performance and what reserve a climber needs to be able to cope with the higher risk and reduce it? The problem is solved by methods of quantitative research and the sample comprises more than 300 respondents. The results of the research prove a significant difference of climbers’ performance in dependence on rate of risk. Climbers usually reach lower performance according to the grading scale when climbing traditional routes with a higher level of risk.

Keywords

rock climbing, traditional climbing, sandstone climbing, performance, rate of risk



DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2014.9.Proc1.08





Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.