Stationary roller versus velodrome for maximal cycling test: A comparison


  • João Brito Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal
  • Luis Lopes Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal
  • Ana Conceição Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal
  • Aldo M. Costa University of Beira Interior, Portugal
  • Hugo Louro Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal



Cycling, Oxygen consumption, Heart rate, Power output, Cadence


The present study aimed to compare the acute cardio-respiratory responses of elite cyclists to a maximal progressive exercise carried out in two different conditions: in a laboratory (using a braked roller) and in an uncovered velodrome. In both testing conditions, ten elite male cyclists (age, 22.3 ± 3.9 years) performed a maximal discontinuous progressive test of 6 minutes per level with 150 W of initial load and increasing 50 W at each level until exhaustion. The heart rate and the ventilation parameters were measured breath-by-breath using a portable metabolic cart gas analysis system with telemetry data transmission. In the first 4 levels of effort, no significant differences were found between the two test conditions regarding VO2, (p=0.193), heart rate (p=0.973) and pedaling cadence (p=0.116). Comparing the maximum values achieved by each athlete in both exercise conditions, significant differences were found for heart rate (p=0.008) and pedaling cadence (p=0.005) but not for VO2max and peak power. Each variable showed a strong correlation between both assessements (VO2, r=0.984, p=0,000; heart rate, r=0.944, p=0.005; pedaling cadence, r=0.900, p=0.014). The amount of variability explained by the linear regression model for both cardio-respiratory parameters also showed a good fit value close to one (VO2max,r2=0.968; heart rate, r2=0.892). Our results suggest that identical cycling protocols conducted in different testing conditions with the same bike leads to equivalent performance but significantly different pedaling cadence and heart rate responses.


NSRF-InALENTEJO, Portugal (ALENT-07-0262-FEDER-001883)


Download data is not yet available.


Abbiss CR, Laursen PB. Models to explain fatigue during prolonged endurance. Sports Med. 2005; 35(10): 865-898.

Adams WC, Mack GW, Langhans GW, Nadel ER. Effects of varied air velocity on sweating and evaporative rates during exercise. J App Physiol. 1992; 73(6): 2668-2674.

Aisbett B, Le Rossignol P. Estimating the total energy demand for supra-maximal exercise using the VO2-power regression from an incremental test. J Sci Med Sport. 2003; 6(3): 343-347.

Amann M, Subudhi AW, Foster C. Predictive validity of ventilatory and lactate thresholds for Cycling time trial performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006; 16(1): 27-34.

Belli A, Hintzy F. Influence of pedaling rate on the energy cost of Cycling in Humans. Eur J App Physiol. 2002; 88(1-2): 158-162.

Bertucci W, Grappe F, Groslambert A. Laboratory versus outdoor cycling conditions: differences in pedaling biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 2007; 23(2): 87-92.

Bertucci W, Taiar R, Grappe F. Differences between sprint tests under laboratory and actual cycling conditions. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005; 45(3): 277-283.

Cheuvront SN, Carter R 3rd, Sawka MN. Fluid balance and endurance exercise performance. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003; 2(4): 220-208.

Heil DP, Wilcox AR, Quinn CM. Cardiorespiratory responses to seat-tube angle variation during steady-state cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995; 27(5): 730-735.

Dias MC, Silva AC, Júnior JM, Lima JR, Novaes JS. Effect of pedal cadence on mechanical power output and physiological variables. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2007; 9(3): 271-276.

Duc S, Bouteille T, Bertucci W, Pernin J-N, Grappe F. Comparison of pedalling EMG activity between when cycling on stationary ergometer and motorised treadmill. Sci Sports. 2006; 21(5): 309-312.

Duc S, Villerius V, Bertucci W, Grappe F. Validity and reproducibility of the ErgomoPro Power Meter compared with the SRM and Powertap Power Meters. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007; 2(3): 270-281.

Gardner AS, Martin JC, Martin DT, Barras M, Jenkins DG. Maximal torque- and power-pedaling rate relationships for elite sprint cyclists in laboratory and field tests. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007; 101(3): 287–292.

González-Alonso J, Teller C, Andersen SL, Jensen FB, Hyldig T, Nielsen B. Influence of body temperature on the development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. J App Physiol. 1999; 86(3): 1032-1039.

Hawley JA, Noakes TD. Peak power output predicts maximal oxygen uptake and performance time in trained cyclists. Eur J App Physiol. 1992; 65(1): 79-83.

Hunter AM, St Clair Gibson A, Mbambo Z, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. The effects of heat stress on neuromuscular activity during endurance exercise. Pflugers Arch. 2002; 444(6): 738-743.

Lucía A, Hoyos J, Pérez M, Chicharro JL. Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(10): 1777-1782.

Lucía A, Hoyos J, Chicharro JL. Preferred pedaling cadence in professional Cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(8): 1361-1366.

Lucía A, Hoyos J, Santalla A, Earnest C, Chicharro JL. Tour de France versus Vuelta a España: which is harder? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(5): 872-878.

Lucía A, San Juan JA, Montilla MV, CaNete S, Santalla A, Earnest C, Pérez M. In professional Road Cyclists, low pedaling cadences are less efficient. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(6): 1048-1054.

Marfell-Jones MJ, Olds T, Stewart AD, Carte L. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom, South Africa: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK); 2006.

Marsh AP, Martin PE. Perceived exertion and the preferred Cycling cadence. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(6): 942-948.

McCann DJ, Adams WC. A dimensional paradigm for identifying the size-independent cost of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(6): 1009-1017.

Millet GP, Tronche C, Fuster N, Bentley DJ, Candau R. Validity and reliability of the Polar® S710 Mobile Cycling Powermeter. Int J Sports Med. 2003; 24(3): 156-161.

Padilla S, Mujika I, Cuesta G, Polo JM, Chatard JC. Validity of a velodrome test for competitive road cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996; 73(5): 446-451.

Prins L, Terblanche E, Myburgh KH. Field and laboratory correlates of performance in competitive cross-country mountain bikers. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25(8): 927-935.

Pugh LG. The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol. 1971; 213(2): 255-276.

Rowell LB, O'Leary DS. Reflex control of the circulation during exercise: Chemoreflexes and mechanoreflexes. J Appl Physiol. 1990; 69(2): 401-418.

Sidossis LS, Horowitz JF, Coyle EF. Load and Velocity of Contraction Influence Gross and Mechanical Efficiency. Int J Sports Med. 1992; 13(5): 407-411.

Swain DP. The influence of body mass in endurance bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994; 26(1): 58-63.

Tatterson AJ, Hahn AG, Martin DT, Febbraio MA. Effects of heat stress on physiological responses and exercise performance in elite cyclists. J Sci Med Sport. 2000; 3(2): 186-193.

Whipp BJ, Rossiter HB. The kinetics of oxygen uptake: physiological inferences from the parameters. In: Oxygen Uptake Kinetics in Sport, Exercise and Medicine, edited by Jones AM, Poole DC. London: Routledge, 62-94; 2005.


Statistics RUA



How to Cite

Brito, J., Lopes, L., Conceição, A., Costa, A. M., & Louro, H. (2014). Stationary roller versus velodrome for maximal cycling test: A comparison. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 9(1), 7–16.



Sport Medicine, Nutrition & Health

Most read articles by the same author(s)