The importance of heart rate monitors in controlling intensity during training and competition in junior biathlon athletes

Kjetil Laurits Høydal, Ivar Nord

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines whether junior athletes successfully regulate training intensity using subjective feeling, or whether heart rate monitor is necessary to regulate intensity. Methods: Nine active junior biathlon athletes, men (n = 6) and women (n = 3) between 16 and 19 years old participated in the study. All participants completed two training sessions at lactate threshold, one session regulated by subjective feeling, blinded for heart rate and one session regulated by heart rate. Results: The participants start the first ten minutes of the training session at lower intensity when blinded, compared to using HR monitors (ES, 0.98; P = 0.05). Registrations at 20 and 30 minutes shows that participants in the non-blinded session gradually tune in to the right intensity, and the differences get smaller and non-significant. Mean speed (ES, 0.61; P = 0.04) and distance covered (ES, 0.63; P = 0.04) during the training session is larger in the heart rate controlled session compared to subjective feeling. Conclusions: Using heart rate monitors provide better control of exercise intensity in young biathletes than subjective feeling. Using subjective feeling underestimate intensity at lactate threshold, and results in significantly, lower distance covered


Keywords

Training intensity; Intensity regulation; Lactate threshold

References

Bassett, D.R., Jr., & Howley, E.T. (2000). Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 32(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012

Borg, G.A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 14(5), 377-81. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012

Coote, J.H. (2010). Recovery of heart rate following intense dynamic exercise. Exp. Physiol. 95(3), 431-40. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2009.047548

Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.

Ekkekakis, P. (2009). Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health. Sports Med., 39(10), 857-88. https://doi.org/10.2165/11315210-000000000-00000

Jin, H., Jiang, Y., Wei, Q., Chen, L., & Ma, G. (2013). Effects of aerobic cycling training on cardiovascular fitness and heart rate recovery in patients with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(2), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130852

Fabre, N., Mourot, L., Zerbini, L., Pellegrini, B., Bortolan, L., & Schena, F. (2013). A novel approach for lactate threshold assessment based on rating of perceived exertion. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 8(3), 263-70. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.8.3.263

Feriche, B., Chicharro, J.L., Vaquero, A.F., Perez, M., & Lucia, A. (1998). The use of a fixed value of RPE during a ramp protocol. Comparison with the ventilatory threshold. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 38(1), 35-8.

Foster, C. (1998). Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 30(7), 1164-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199807000-00023

Foster, C., Florhaug, J.A., Franklin, J., Gottschall, L., Hrovatin, L.A., Parker, S., Doleshal, P., & Dodge, C. (2001a). A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J. Strength Cond. Res. 15(1), 109-15.

Foster, C., Heimann, M.K., Esten, P.L., Brice, G., & Porcari, J.P. (2001b). Differences in perceptions of training by coaches and athletes. The South African journal of medical sciences 8, 3-7.

Grant, S., Craig, I., Wilson, J., & Aitchison, T. (1997). The relationship between 3 km running performance and selected physiological variables. J. Sports Sci., 15(4), 403-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404197367191

Helgerud, J., Hoydal, K., Wang, E., Karlsen, T., Berg, P., Bjerkaas, M., Simonsen, T., Helgesen, C., Hjorth, N., Bach, R. et al. (2007). Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 39(4), 665-71. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3180304570

Helgerud, J., Ingjer, F., & Stromme, S.B. (1990). Sex differences in performance-matched marathon runners. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol., 61(5-6), 433-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236064

Larsson, P.U., Wadell, K.M., Jakobsson, E.J., Burlin, L.U., & Henriksson-Larsen, K.B. (2004). Validation of the MetaMax II portable metabolic measurement system. Int. J. Sports Med. 25(2), 115-23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-819953

Laursen, P.B. (2010). Training for intense exercise performance: high-intensity or high-volume training? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports., 20 Suppl 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01184.x

McLaughlin, J.E., Howley, E.T., Bassett, D.R., Jr., Thompson, D.L., & Fitzhugh, E.C. (2010). Test of the classic model for predicting endurance running performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 42(5), 991-7. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c0669d

Norwegian Biathlon Federation. Utviklingstrapp skiskyting [Internet]. Norwegian Biathlon federation Available from: http://www.skiskyting.no/no/utvikling/trening/utviklingstrapp/

Rose, E.A., & Parfitt, G. (2010). Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: a protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 7:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-15

Seiler, K.S., & Kjerland, G.O. (2006). Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 16(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x

Yoshida, T. (1986). Effect of dietary modifications on anaerobic threshold. Sports Med., 3(1), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198603010-00002

Yoshida, T., Udo, M., Iwai, K., & Yamaguchi, T. (1993). Physiological characteristics related to endurance running performance in female distance runners. J. Sports Sci., 11(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419308729964




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.122.12