Influence and interpretation of intrinsic and extrinsic exercise motives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.122.18Keywords:
Exercise adherence, Self-Determination theory, Exercise motivations inventory, Organismic integration theoryAbstract
This study explores the relationships between, and perceptions of, various exercise motivations and exercise adherence. The application of self-determination theory to exercise motivations research has demonstrated the importance of intrinsic motivations, however, the influence of extrinsic motivations has not been thoroughly examined. This study placed exercise motive perceptions along the Organismic Integration Theory’s (OIT) spectrum of motivations, and identified associations between those interpretations and exercise adherence. Participants (812 college students) completed an online survey detailing their exercise motivations and participation. The Exercise Motivations Inventory-2 (EMI-2) was used to measure exercise motivations, and participants provided open-ended explanations for their ratings of each motivational sub-construct. Total exercise scores were calculated by assigning MET values to exercise bouts using the Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire. Multiple regression analyses revealed stress management, enjoyment, competition, and weight management as predictors of exercise, and appearance as a negative predictor for females. Analysis of the open-ended motive explanations found participants held diverse perspectives on the health, appearance, weight management, and fitness motivations. The varying interpretations of health and appearance motives ranged across the OIT. Based on motivation theory, they may be conducive to the process of internalization, meaning they may develop into more intrinsic motivations as participants achieve goals and develop a sense of value for the exercise activities. Additional patterns were identified that require further research, including a gap between genders with respect to exercise enjoyment, and the difference between weight management and appearance as predictors of exercise adherence.
Funding
Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Coaching, University of Wisconsin-WhitewaterDownloads
References
American College Health Association. (2012). College Health Association – National college health assessment II: Reference group executive summary fall 2011. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.
Borg, G.A. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sport Exer, 14(5), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). State indicator report on physical activity. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Connell, J.P., & Wellborn, J.G. (1990). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M.R. Gunnar & L.A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 22, (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and self-setermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Duncan, L. R., Hall, C. R., Wilson, P. M., & Jenny, O. (2010). Exercise motivation: A cross-sectional analysis examining its relationships with frequency, intensity and duration of exercise. Int J Behav Nutr Phy, 7(7). http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/7 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-7
Ednie, A.E., & Stibor, M. (2016). A comparison of fitness ratings to exercise patterns and motivations among college students. J Kinesiol Wellness, 4(1). http://www.wskw.org/sites/wskw.org/files/fitness_motivations_ednie.pdf
Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2005). Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A Handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 147-159). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Garber, C.E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M.R., Franklin, B.A., Lamonte, M.J., Lee, I., Nieman, D.C., & Swain, D.P. (2011). Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sport Exer, 43(7), 1334-1359. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
Godin, G., & Shepherd, R. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci, 10(3), 141-146.
Haase, A., Steptoe, A., & Sallis, J.F. (2004). Leisure-time physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development. Prev Med, 39(1), 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.028
Huang, C., Lee, L., & Chang, M. (2007). The influence of personality and motivation on exercise participation and quality of life. Soc Behav Personal, 35(9), 1189-1210. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.9.1189
Ingledew, D. K., & Markland, D. (2008). The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychol Health, 23(7), 807-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701405704
Jacobs, D.R., Ainsworth, B.E., Hartman, T.J. & Leon, A.S. (1993). A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sport Exer, 25(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199301000-00012
Kilpatrick, M. & Hebert, E., & Bartholomew, J. (2005). College students' motivation for physical activity: Differentiating men's and women's motives for sport participation and exercise. J Am Coll Health, 54(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.54.2.87-94
Kulavic, K., Hultquist, C.N., & McLester, J.R. (2013). A comparison of motivational factors and barriers to physical activity among traditional versus nontraditional college students. J Am Coll Health, 61(2), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2012.753890
Maltby, J. & Day, L. (2001). The relationship between exercise motives and psychological well-being. J Psychol, 135(6), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603726
Markland, D., & Ingledew, D.K. (1997). The measurement of exercise motives: Factoral validity and invariance across gender in a revised exercise motivations inventory. Brit J Health Psych, 2(4), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.1997.tb00549.x
Markland, D., & Tobin, V. J. (2010). Need support and behavioural regulations for exercise among exercise referral scheme clients: The mediating role of psychological need satisfaction. Psychol Sport Exerc, 11(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.07.001
McDonough, M. H., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2007). Testing self-determined motivation as a mediator of the relationship between psychological needs and affective and behavioral outcomes. J Sport Exercise Psy, 29(5), 645-663. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.5.645
Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. J Educ Psychol, 88(2), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.203
Plotnikoff, R.C., Costigan, S.A., Williams, R.L., Hutchesson, M.J., Kennedy, S.G., Robards, S.L., Allen, J., Collins, C.E., Callister, R., & Germov, J. (2015). Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phy, 12: 10p.
Ryan, R.M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. J Pers, 63(3), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In R.M. Ryan & E.L. Deci (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, N.Y.: The University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R.M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E.L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Dev Psychopathol, 9(4), 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001405
Scherr, J., Wolfarth, B., Christly, J.W., Pressler, A., Wagenpfeil, S., & Halle, M. (2013). Associations between Borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measure of exercise intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol, 113(1), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2421-x
Teixeira, P.J., Carraca, E.V., Markland, D., Silva, M.N., & Ryan, R.M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy, 9(1), 78-108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78
Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Ntoumanis, N. (2006). The role of self-determined motivation in the understanding of exercise behaviours, cognitions and physical self-evaluations. J Sport Sci, 24(4), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500131670
Weinstock, J. (2010). A review of exercise as intervention for sedentary hazardous drinking college students: rationale and issues. J Am Coll Health, 58(6): 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481003686034
World Health Organization. (2016). Physical Activity Fact Sheet. Retrieved November 27, 2016 from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/.
Wilson, P.M., Rodgers, W.M., Fraser, S.N., & Murray, T.C. (2004). Relationships between exercise regulations and motivational consequences in university students. Res Q Exercise Sport, 75(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609136
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
