The relationship between action inhibition and athletic performance in elite badminton players and non-athletes
Keywords:Racket sports, Cognitive ability, Action control, Sports performance
AbstractRacket sports are among the most popular sports in the world. They require higher-order cognitive processes to execute complex actions to achieve successful performance on the court. Action inhibition is the ability to suppress ongoing actions; it is crucial to achieving higher levels of sports performance. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of expertise on action inhibition in badminton players and non-athletes. Current study recruited forty-two professional badminton players and matched fifteen non-athlete controls to participate in the study. Badminton player was asked to fill out the questionnaire for collect their information of training background. Matched participants then performed the stop signal task for evaluation of their action inhibition ability. We compare the difference in cognitive performance between badminton player and non-athlete controls group. The results showed that badminton players had a greater likelihood than non-athletes of successfully inhibiting their responses during stop trials. Furthermore, a strong positive correlation indicated that badminton players who participated in higher levels of competition had better performance on response inhibition. To concluded, the present study links the relationship between cognitive ability and athletic performance in badminton player. Moreover, the results of the present study on action inhibition in sports expertise may provide information for future sports training and benefits for those who suffer from cognitive difficulties.
FundingProfessor Erik Chihung Chang and Mr. Zai-Fu Yao of Action and Cognition Laboratory in Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at National Central University, Taiwan
Alves, H., Voss, M., Boot, W., Deslandes, A., Cossich, V., Salles, J., & Kramer, A. (2013). Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in Elite Volleyball Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00036
Chan, J., Wong, A., Liu, Y., Yu, J., & Yan, J. (2011). Fencing expertise and physical fitness enhance action inhibition. Psychology of Sports and Exercise, 12(5), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.04.006
Cona, G., Cavazzana, A., Paoli, A., Marcolin, G., Grainer, A., & Bisiacchi, P. (2015). It's a Matter of Mind! Cognitive Functioning Predicts the Athletic Performance in Ultra-Marathon Runners. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0132943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132943
De Passos, V., Giatti, L., Bensenor, I., Tiemeier, H., Ikram, A., de Figueiredo, R., Barreto, S. (2015). Education plays a greater role than age in cognitive test performance among participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Neurology, 15(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0454-6
Fichman, H., Fernandes, C., Nitrini, R., Lourenço, R., de Paradela, E., Carthery-Goulart, M., & Caramelli, P. (2009). Age and educational level effects on the performance of normal elderly on category verbal fluency tasks. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 3(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30100010
Jongen, E., Brijs, K., Komlos, M., Brijs, T., & Wets, G. (2011). Inhibitory control and reward predict risky driving in young novice drivers – a simulator study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.067
Lee, S, Kawachi, I, & Berkman, LF. (2003). Education, other socioeconomic indicators, and cognitive function. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg042
Lee, H., Lo, Y.-H., Li, K.-H., Sung, W.-S., & Juan, C.-H. (2015). The relationship between the development of response inhibition and intelligence in preschool children, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00802
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1994-97487-005
Mäntylä, T., Karlsson, M., & Marklund, M. (2009). Executive Control Functions in Simulated Driving. Applied Neuropsychology, 16(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280802644086
Ooi, C.H., Tan, A., Ahmad, A., & Kwong, K.W. (2009). Physiological characteristics of elite and sub-elite badminton players. Journal of sports Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903352907
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G., & Stevens, M. (2008). STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.479
Verburgh, L., Scherder, E., van Lange, P., & Oosterlaan, J. (2014). Executive Functioning in Highly Talented Soccer Players. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e91254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091254
Vestberg, T., Gustafson, R., Maurex, L., Ingvar, M., & Petrovic, P. (2012). Executive Functions Predict the Success of Top-Soccer Players. PLoS ONE, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034731
Visu-Petra, L., Cheie, L., Benga, O., & Miclea, M. (2011). Cognitive control goes to school: The impact of executive functions on academic performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.069
Wang, C.-H., Chang, C.-C., Liang, Y.-M., Shih, C.-M., Chiu, W.-S., Tseng, P., Hung D.L., Tzeng J. L. O., Muggleton G.N., Juan, C.-H. (2013). Open vs. Closed Skill Sports and the Modulation of Inhibitory Control. PLoS ONE, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055773
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.