2015 Badminton World Championship: Singles final men’s vs women’s behaviours


  • Raúl Valldecabres Escuela de Doctorado de la Universidad Católica de Valencia, Spain http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7478-7526
  • Ana María de Benito Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Universidad Católica de Valencia, Spain
  • Claudio Alberto Casal Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Universidad Católica de Valencia, Spain
  • Carlos Pablos Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Universidad Católica de Valencia,






The purpose of the current study was to identify players’ behaviours and to assess differences between genders at final singles matches of 2015 Badminton World Championship, focusing on time events, shots and court movements. Final men’s (MS) and women’s (WS) singles matches of 2015 Yakarta World Championship were analysed (150 points and 967 actions). Official videos from Badminton World Federation were used to carry out the post-event analysis. Variables analyzed were: ‘timing factors’, type of ‘shots’ and players’ trajectories executed during the match. Descriptive (mean and % of distribution) and comparative analysis between gender and result of events (successful vs. unsuccessful) were carried out. Generally speaking, time-related variables show higher figures in the men’s final than in the women’s. Smash, net and lob shots occur more frequently in the men’s final, whereas clear, drop and drive shots are used more often in the women’s final. The hitting of the shuttlecock without any previous movement redominates over the rest or movements for both genders. In the training field, these findings may be used by coaches in order to improve athletes’ performance. In research field, it could be a new way to obtain information that had not been previously taken into account.


Programa Becas VALi d. Generalitat Valenciana


Download data is not yet available.


Abián, P., Castanedo, A., Feng, X. Q., Sampedro, J., & Abian-Vicen, J. (2014). Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(1), 42–53. http://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868701

Abian-Vicen, J., Castanedo, A., Abian, P., & Sampedro, J. (2013). Temporal and notational comparison of badminton matches between men’s singles and women’s singles. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 310–320. http://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868650

Anguera, M. T. (1990). Metodología observacional. En J. Arnau, M. T. Anguera, & J. Gómez-Benito (Eds.), Metodología de la investigación en ciencias del comportamiento (pp. 125-236). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.

Anguera, M. T. (1993). Proceso de categorización (pp. 115-168). Presentado en Metodología observacional en la investigación psicológica, Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias, PPU.

Belmont, I. (1978). Principios éticos y directrices para la protección de sujetos humanos de investigación. Estados Unidos de Norteamérica: Reporte de la Comisión Nacional para la Protección de Sujetos Humanos de Investigación Biomédica y de Comportamiento.

Cabello, D. (2000). Análisis de las características del juego en el bádminton de competición. Su aplicación al entrenamiento. Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva.

Cabello, D., & González-Badillo, J. J. (2003). Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. British journal of sports medicine, 37(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.1.62

Cabello, D., Serrano, D., & García, J. M. (1999). Fundamentos del bádminton: de la iniciación al alto rendimiento (Vol. 29). Málaga: Instituto Andaluz del Deporte.

Chen, H. L., & Chen, T. C. (2008). Temporal structure comparison of the new and conventional scoring systems for men's badminton singles in Taiwan. Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness, 6(1), 34-43.

Chen, H. L., Wu, C. J., & Chen, T. C. (2011). Physiological and Notational Comparison of New and Old Scoring Systems of Singles Matches in Men's Badminton. Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 17(1), 6-17.

Faude, O., Meyer, T., Rosenberger, F., Fries, M., Huber, G., & Kindermann, W. (2007). Physiological characteristics of badminton match play. European journal of applied physiology, 100(4), 479-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0441-8

Fontes, T., Chiminazzo, J., Dobránszky, I., & Marque de Moraes, A. (2014). Análise da quantificação das ações motoras e da estrutura temporal no badminton. Revista Brasileira de Prescrição e Fisiologia do Exercício (RBPFEX), 8(50), 1.

Gabin, B., Camerino, O., Anguera, M. T., & Castañer, M. (2012). Lince: Multiplatform Sport Analysis Software. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4692-4694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.320

Gibbs, M. J. (1988). Badminton-Teaching Concepts. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 59(8), 92-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1988.10606299

Hernández, M. (1989). Iniciación al badminton. Gymnos.

Huber, G. (1999). See the roots and understand the tree. IBF World Badminton Academy Malaysia, (Kuala Lumpur: IBF).

Kuntze, G., Mansfield, N., & Sellers, W. (2010). A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(2), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903428533

Laffaye, G., Phomsoupha, M., & Dor, F. (2015). Changes in the Game Characteristics of a Badminton Match: A Longitudinal Study through the Olympic Game Finals Analysis in Men’s Singles. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(3), 584–590.

Losada, J. L., Casal, C. A., & Ardá, A. (2015). Cómo mejorar la efectividad en un jugador de tenis: modelos de regresión log-lineales. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 15(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1578-84232015000100006

Ming, C. L., Keong, C. C., & Ghosh, A. K. (2008). Time motion and notational analysis of 21 point and 15 point badminton match play. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 2(4), 216–222.

Pearce, A. J. (2002). A physiological and notational comparison of the conventional and new scoring systems in badminton. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 43, 49-67.

Sánchez-Algarra, P., & Anguera, M. T. (2013). Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 1237-1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9764-6

Valldecabres, R., de Benito, A.M., Casal, C.A. & Pablos, C. (2017). Diseño y validación de una herramienta observacional para bádminton (BOT) / Design and validity of a bádminton observational tool (BOT). Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. Vol. (*). In Press. http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/inpress/artaceptados.htm


Statistics RUA



How to Cite

Valldecabres, R., de Benito, A. M., Casal, C. A., & Pablos, C. (2017). 2015 Badminton World Championship: Singles final men’s vs women’s behaviours. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(3proc), S775-S788. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.12.Proc3.01

Most read articles by the same author(s)