Relationship between the armed arm’s motor response and muscle activation time during the lunge in fencers of varied ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.131.06Keywords:
Surface electromyography, Motor control, Biomechanics, Sport performance, Reaction timeAbstract
The present work studied potential differences in activation times of selected muscles associated with the motor responses of the armed arm and differences in selected muscle pairs activation during the fencing lunge. Twenty-eight fencers (epée fencers, aged 22.1 ± 5.4 years) grouped into elite and beginning skill levels, participated in this study. Surface electromyography was used to determine muscle activation time (time period measured from visual stimulus occurrence to the moment of muscle activation threshold detection). For motor response, we measured the time between visual stimulus occurrence and armed arm movement. A significant difference was found between elite and beginning fencers in the motor response of the armed arm. Detection of armed arm’s motor response was significantly later in beginners. Greater time disparities between arm’s motor response and muscle activation time of the m. rectus femoris on the front/lunge side was also found in beginners. Lastly, difference was detected between elite and beginning fencers regarding the muscle activation time of selected muscle pairs. Future studies and trainers can use these results to further explore key areas of motor control and biomechanics for improving of fencing performance.Funding
The research was conducted with the support of the specific university research grant SGS and IG in the J. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem.Downloads
References
Allerdissen, M., Güldenpenning, I., Schack, T., & Bläsing B. (2017). Recognizing fencing attacks from auditory and visual information: A comparison between expert fencers and novices. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31(1), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.04.009
Adrian, M., & Klinger, A. (1976). A biomechanical analysis of the fencing lunge. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 8(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-197621000-00058
Bober, T., Rutkowska-Kucharska, A., Jaroszczuk, S., Barabasz, M., & Woźnica, W. (2017). Kinematic characterization of the lunge and the fleche in epee fencing: two case studies. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 23(4), 181-185.
Borysiuk, Z., & Waskiewicz, Z. (2008). Information processes, stimulation and perceptual training in fencing. Journal of Human Kinetics, 19(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-008-0005-y
Bottoms, L., Greenhalgh, A., & Sinclair, J. (2013). Kinematic determinants of weapon velocity during the fencing lunge in experienced épée fencers. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 15(4), 109-113.
Carboch, J., Süss, V., & Kocib, T. (2014). Ball Machine Usage in Tennis: Movement Initiation and Swing Timing While Returning Balls from a Ball Machine and from a Real Server. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(2), 304–308.
Czajkowski, Z. (2005). Understanding fencing: The unity and practice. Staten Island, NY: SKA Swordplay Books.
Doyle, T. P., Lutz, R. S., Pellegrino, J. K., Sanders, D. J., & Arent, S. M. (2016). The effects of caffeine on arousal, response time, accuracy, and performance in division I collegiate fencers. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(11), 3228-3235. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001602
Enoka, R. (2008). Neuromechanics of human movement. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
Frère, J., Göepfert, B., Nüesch, C., Huber, C., Fischer, M., Wirz, D., & Friederich, N. F. (2011). Kinematical and EMG-classifications of a fencing attack. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267199
Geil, M. D. (2002). The role of footwear on kinematics and plantar foot pressure in fencing. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 18(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.18.2.155
Gholipour, M., Tabrizi, A., & Farahmand, F. (2008). Kinematics analysis of lunge fencing using stereophotogrametry. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 1(1), 32-37.
Gutiérrez-Cruz, C., Rojas, F. J., & Guriérrez-Davila, M. (2016). Effect of defence response time during lunge in foil fencing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(7), 651-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1068434
Gutiérrez-Davila, M., Rojas, F. J., Antonio, R., & Navarro, E. (2013). Response timing in the lunge and target change in elite versus medium-level fencers. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(4), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.635704
Hagemann, N., Shorer, J., Ca-al-Bruland, R., Lotz, S., & Strauss B. (2010). Visual perception in fencing: Do the eye movements of fencers represent their information pickup? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2204-2214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196695
Harmenberg, J., Ceci, R., Barvestad, P., Hjerpe, K., & Nyström, J. (1991). Comparison of different tests of fencing performance. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12(6), 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1024736
Chan, J. S. Y., Wong, A. C. N., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Yan, J. (2011). Fencing expertise and physical fitness enhance action inhibition. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(5), 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.04.006
Chen, T. L-W., Wong, D. W-C., Wang, Y., Ren, S., Yan, F., & Zhang, M. (2017). Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review. PLoS ONE, 12(2): e0171578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171578
Cheris, E. (2002). Fencing. Step to success. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Kriventsova, I., Iermakov, S., Bartik, P., Nosko, M., & Cynarski, W.J. (2017). Optimization of student-fencers´ tactical training. Ido Movement for Culture - Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 17(3), 21-30. https://10.14589/ido.17.3.3
Roi G. S., & Bianchedi, D. (2008). The science of fencing. implications for performance and injury prevention. Sports Medicine, 38(6), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838060-00003
Sillero, M., Saucedo, F., López, E., De Antonio, R., & De Quel, O. M. (2008). Analysis of the rear leg rotation movement during the fencing lunge. Fencing, Science & Technology, 1st International Congress on Science and Technology in Fencing . Barcelona.
Sinclair, J., & Bottoms, L. (2013a). Methods of determining hip joint centre: Their influence on the 3-d kinematics of the hip and knee during the fencing lunge. Human Movement, 14(3), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.2478/humo-2013-0028
Sinclair, J., & Bottoms, L. (2013b). Gender differences in the kinetics and lower extremity kinematics of the fencing lunge. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(2), 440-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2013.11868660
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. 4th ed. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
Stewart, S. I., & Kopetka, B. (2005). The kinematic determinants of speed in the fencing lunge. Journal of Sport Sciences, 23, 105.
Szilagyi, T. (1993). Dynamic characterisation of fencing lunge. International Society of Biomechanics. XIVth Congress, Paris.
Špulák, D., Čmejla, R., Mikulíková, P., Bezoušková Paulů, J., & Kračmar, B. (2012). Muscle activity detection using EMG envelope thresholding-comparison of various approaches. 20th Annual Conference Proceeding’s Technical Computing. Bratislava.
Turner, A., Bishop, Ch., Chavda, S., Edwards, M., Brazier, J., & Kilduff, L. (2016). Physical characteristics underpinning lunging and change of direction speed in fencing. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(8), 2235-2241. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001320
Wąsik, J. (2015). Kinetics of the knife-hand strike used in power breaking in ITF Taekwon-do. Physical Activity Review, 3(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2015.01.05
Wąsik, J., & Góra, T. (2016). Impact of target selection on front kick kinematics in taekwondo - pilot study. Physical Activity Review, 4(1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2016.04.07
Weichenberger, M., Shilling-Kästle, V., Mentz, L., Engleder, T., Hessling, M. (2015). A fencing robot for performance testing in elite fencers. Sports Technology, 8(3-4), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19346182.2015.1108326
Williams, L. R. T., & Walmsley, A. (2000a). Response amendment in fencing: Differences between elite and novice subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.131
Williams, L. R. T., & Walmsley, A. (2000b). Response timing and muscular coordination in fencing: A comparison of elite and novice fencers. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 3(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(00)80011-0
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
