Continuous assessment and interactive response systems in higher education
Keywords:Physical education, Continuous assessment, Educational technology, Interactive response systems, Educational innovation
AbstractThere is evidence that the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has the potential to improve assessment methods, and therefore, learning process and results. This study compares the effect of two different types of assessment on the learning results of university students: traditional continuous assessment (TCA) and continuous assessment with the interactive response system Educlick (CAE). A quasi-experimental study with 364 students of the degree in Primary Education was conducted. Partial and final marks obtained with TCA and CAE were analysed and the influence of both assessments on the final examination (FE) was considered. It was also studied the different psychological variables that influence the assessment process, which were present in the intervention groups. To this aim, a descriptive analysis of data using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric tests were developed through SPSS software. Results revealed a higher percentage of passes (81.5% compared to 74.5%), better marks and higher attendance of the first FE among students assessed with CAE (99.3%) as opposed to students assessed with TCA (91.7%). Findings underline the importance of implementing innovative technological methods, such as the interactive resource proposed in this paper, to develop new and improved skill-based competences in the teaching-learning process.
FundingUniversity of Seville
Amo, E., Jareño, F., Lagos, M.G., & Tobarra, M.A. (2014). New teaching methodologies and their influence on the curricula. Innovate: Journal of Administrative and Social Sciences, 24(54), 231-249.
Cadenato, A., & Martínez, M. (2008). The evaluation within the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), ICE Monographs of the Polytechnic University of Catalonia.
Caldwell, J.E. (2007). Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
Calvo-Gallego, F.J., & Sepúlveda-Gómez, M. (2012). New technologies and learning labour law: labour law portal. In M.J. Sánchez and E.M. Buitrago (Coordinators). European Higher Education Area (EHEA): Methodological Innovations in Economy and Business (pp. 17-30). Spain: Digital@tres.
Cebrián, F.J., & García, R.L. (2015). Continuous evaluation activities. Correlation with final examination mark and effect on the final mark. Evidence on Business Administration and Management. Journal Complutense of Education, 26(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.n2.42948
Ciampa K. (2014). Learning in a Mobile Age: An Investigation of Student Motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12036
Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., Mayordomo, R. M., & Naranjo, M. (2007). Continuous assessment and support for learning: An experience in educational innovation with ICT support in higher education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 783-804. Retrieved from https://0-search.proquest.com.fama.us.es/docview/61949725?accountid=14744
Delgado, A.M., & Oliver, R. (2006). Continuous evaluation in a new teaching scenario. Journal of University and Society of Knowledge, 3(1): 1-13.
Derri, V., Avgerinos, A., Emmanouilidou, K., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). What do Greek physical education teachers know about elementary student assessment? Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 7(3), 658-670. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.73.06
Dhir, A., Gahwaji, N.M., & Nyman, G. (2013). The Role of the iPad in the Hands of the Learner. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19, 706-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.3217/jucs-019-05-0706
Draper, S., & Brown, M. (2004). Increasing Interactivity in Lectures Using an Electronic Voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
Gallardo, E.G., & Montolio, D. (2011). Is there a relation between continuous evaluation and students results? E-public: E-Journal on Teaching Public Economy, (8), 63-79.
García-Valcárcel, A., Basilotta, V., & López-Salamanca, C. (2014). ICTs in the collaborative learning within the Primary and Secondary classroom. Communicate: Journal of Scientific Communication and Education, 21(42), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-06
Gracia, J., & Pinar, M.A. (2009). A practical competence-based evaluation experience using the student portfolio and its temporary impact. Journal of University Educational Formation and Innovation, 2(2), 76-8.
Herradón, R., Blanco, J., Pérez, A., & Sánchez, J.A. (2009). B-learning experiences and methodologies for training and evaluation of generic competences in Engineering. The University Question, 5, 33-45.
Harris, J. L., Al-Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2016). One to one technology and its effect on student academic achievement and motivation.Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 368-381. Retrieved from https://0-search.proquest.com.fama.us.es/docview/1871587570?accountid=14744
Huertas, A., & Pantoja, A. (2016). Effects of an educational programme based on the use of ICTs on the academic performance and motivation of students taking the module Secondary Educational Technology. Education XXI, 19(2), 229-250.
Johnson, C. (2004). Clickers in your Classroom. Wakonse-Arizona E-Newsletter, 3(1), 71-77.
Leung, L., & Zhang, R. (2016). Predicting Tablet Use: A Study of Gratifications-sought, Leisure Boredom, and Multitasking. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.013
Llamas-Nistal, M. (2012). A Continuous Evaluation Experience in the Higher Technical School of Telecommunication Enginnering (ETSIT) : New Costs for the Teacher. IEEE-RITA. Ibero-american Journal of Learning Technologies, 7(1), 46-52.
Marés, L. (2012). Tablets in education, oportunities and chanllenges in politics one by one. Buenos Aires: Organization of Ibero-amerian States (OEI) . Latin American Net of Educational Portals (RELPE).
Martínez-Clares, P., Pérez-Cusó, J., & Martínez-Juárez, M. (2016). ICTs and virtual environment for university tutorial. Education XXI, 19(1), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.13942
Martínez-González, M., & Martínez-Carrasco, A. (2010). The use of Educlick for evaluation and learning in Physiotherapy. Students' opinion. In J.J. Maquilón, M.P. García-Sanz and M.L. Belmonte (Coordinators) Educational innovation in Formal Teaching (pp. 39-46). Murcia: University of Murcia.
Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the Classroom: an Active Learning Approach. Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 71-74.
Mingorance, A.C. (2008). Comparative analysis of the results of a continuos evaluation with other punctual evaluation. The case of the module Macroeconomy. Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 95-120.
Mourín-Moral, F.J. (2014). Perceptions and attitude towards the response systems in the classroom. Caracciolos. Digital Journal of Research in Teaching, 2(1).
Murillo, F.J., & Martínez-Garrido, C. (2013). Impact of Homework on Academic Performance. A Study of Iberoamerican Students of Primary Education. Journal of Psycodidactics, 18(1), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.6156
O'Bannon, B. W., Skolits, G. J., &Lubke, J. K. (2017). The influence of digital interactive textbook instruction on student learning preferences, outcomes, and motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3), 14. Retrieved from https://0-search.proquest.com.fama.us.es/docview/1969008250?accountid=14744 https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1303798
Peinado-Miguel, F., Fernández-Sande, M., Rodríguez-Barba, D., & Ortiz-Sobrino, M.A. (2013). Learning and Innovation: A Methodological Proposal from the Teaching of Media Management. Latin Journal of Social Communication, 68, 115-138. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-971
Pérez-Escoda, A., Castro-Zubizarreta, A., & Fandos-Igado, M. (2016). Digital competence of Z Generation: keys points for its academic introduction in Primary Education. Communicate: ScientificJournal of Communication and Education 24(49). https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-07
Porto, M., García, M.L., & Navarro, E. (2013). What do evaluation tools test? Students' assessments. ARBOR Science, Knowledge and Culture, 189(760). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2013.760n2004
Powell, S., Straub, C., Rodriguez, J., & Van Horn, B. 2011. Using Clickers in Large College Psychology Classes: Academic Achievement and Perceptions. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(4), 1-11.
Prim, M., Oliver, J., & Soler, V. (2009). Interactive Technologies in Digital Systems Classes. IEEE-RITA. Ibero-american Journal of Learning Technologies, 4(1), 63-68.
Puentes, A., Roig, R., Sanhueza, S., & Friz, M. (2013). Ideas on Information and Communication Technology (TIC) and their educational implications: An exploratory study with teachers from the province of Ñuble, Chile. Ibero-american Journal of Science, Technology and Society - CTS, 8(22), 75-88.
Ricaurte-Quijano, P., & Carli-Álvarez, A. (2016). Wiki Learning project: Wikipedia as an open learning environment. Scientific Journal of Communication and Education, 24(49). https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-06
Ricoy, M.C., & Fernández-Rodríguez, J. (2013). University students's view on evaluation: A case study. Education XXI, 16 (2), 321-342.
Román, M., & Murillo, F.J. (2012). Learning Environments with Technological Resources: A Look at their Contribution to Student Performance in Latin American Elementary Schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1107-1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9262-5
Serrano, J.L., & Prendes, M.P. (2012). Teaching and learning Physics and collaborative work with the use of ICTs. RELATEC. Latin AmericanJournal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 95-107.
Siau K., Sheng, H., & Fui-Hoon, F. (2006). Use of a Classroom Response System to Enhance Classroom Interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879802
Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2016). Teaching perception on the digital transformation of the classroom through tablets: a study in the Spanish context. Communicate: Journal of Scientific Communication and Education, 24(49), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-08
Yuste-Tosina, R., Alonso-Díaz, L., & Blázquez-Entonado, F. (2012). The e-evaluation of learnings in Higher Education by means of synchronous virtual classrooms. Communicate: Journal of Scientific Communication and Education, 20(39), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.3916/C39-2012-03-06
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.