The mediating role of environmental collaborations in the relationship manufacturing technologies and green innovation among firms in Thai sports industry
Keywords:
Green innovation, Manufacturing, Sports, ThailandAbstract
The study has examined the mediating role of environmental collaborations in the relationship manufacturing technologies and green innovation among firms in Thai sports industry. The response rate of the study is 47 percent. The hypotheses are aligned with the design of research questions and by using the smart PLS 3.1.2 which is also known as the second-generation multivariate data analysis, we have analysed the reliability and validity of the instrument by the assessment of structural and measurement model. The results show the important mediating role of internal environmental collaboration between the green innovation and modern manufacturing technologies. For the examination of fundamental mechanism, the current study has addressed the need for empirical study that how the adoption of modern manufacturing technologies increases the green innovation. The results have provided the beneficial extension of modern manufacturing technologies and green innovation by ensuring that for the firms it is important to understand the fundamental relation between the adoption of modern manufacturing technologies and fostering green innovation. Firstly, the current study we have imperially examine the association between modern manufacturing technologies and green innovation at measurement level and have incorporated modern manufacturing technologies as an ancestor of green innovation. Secondly, we have also developed complete theoretical model that with the use of modern manufacturing technologies how green innovation of the firm can get benefits with important mediator that is internal environmental collaboration. Thirdly with the context of developing economy the current study will increase the literature of green innovation. Our findings will be helpful for the managers of Thai sports industry that how to deal with problems in green innovation because of implementations of modern manufacturing technologies.Downloads
References
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002
Ahmadian, S., & Abdolmaleki, S. (2018). Network typology and international opportunity recognition: moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0104-8
Aluko, O. A. (2017). Drivers of green shipping practices adoption and impact on organisational performance. Brunel University London.
Amaro, S., & Duarte, P. (2016). Modelling formative second order constructs in PLS. Paper presented at the European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies.
Azam, M., & Khan, A. Q. (2017). Growth-corruption-health triaca and environmental degradation: empirical evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(19), 16407-16417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9299-4
Bajwa, M. M. T. (2018). Closed-loop Supply Chain: A Systematic Review. University of Waterloo.
Bharadwaj, A. (2018). Environmental regulations and innovation in advanced automobile technologies: Perspectives from Germany, India, China and Brazil: Springer.
Bromiley, P., & Rau, D. (2016). Operations management and the resource based view: Another view. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003
Charter, M., & Tischner, U. (2017). Sustainable solutions: developing products and services for the future: Routledge.
Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 516-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0433-x
Dahab, S., Maag, S., & Bagnato, A. (2016). A learning based approach for green software measurements.
Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932
Doppelt, B. (2017). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351278966
Enkel, E., Groemminger, A., & Heil, S. (2018). Managing technological distance in internal and external collaborations: absorptive capacity routines and social integration for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1257-1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9557-0
Epelbaum, F. M. B., & Martinez, M. G. (2014). The technological evolution of food traceability systems and their impact on firm sustainable performance: A RBV approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.01.007
Hair, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.3926/oss.37
Hair, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
Hair, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128
Hamdoun, M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Othman, H. B. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 759-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031
Haseeb, M., Hussain, H., Kot, S., Androniceanu, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance. Sustainability, 11(14), 3811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143811
Haseeb, M., Hussain, H., Slusarczyk, B., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Industry 4.0: A Solution towards Technology Challenges of Sustainable Business Performance. Social Sciences, 8(5), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050154
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Huenteler, J., Ossenbrink, J., & Schmidt, T. S., Hoffmann, Volker H. (2016). How a product’s design hierarchy shapes the evolution of technological knowledge—Evidence from patent-citation networks in wind power. Research Policy, 45(6), 1195-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.014
Invernizzi, D. C., Locatelli, G., & Brookes, N. J. (2018). The need to improve communication about scope changes: frustration as an indicator of operational inefficiencies. Production Planning & Control, 29(9), 729-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1461949
Jermsittiparsert, K. & Srisawat, S. (2019). Complexities in a Flexible Supply Chain and the Role of Knowledge Transfer. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7263
Jha, C. K. (2016). Supply chain optimization approaches and market demand analysis of petroleum industry: A case study of ONGC. International Journal of scientific research and management (IJSRM), 4(7), 4461-4475. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v4i7.15
Kong, T., Feng, T., & Ye, C. (2016). Advanced manufacturing technologies and green innovation: The role of internal environmental collaboration. Sustainability, 8(10), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101056
Kyriakopoulos, G. L., & Arabatzis, G. (2016). Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: Energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1044-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.046
Karle Pravin P, Dhawale Shashikant C. "Manilkara zapota (L.) Royen Fruit Peel: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 10.1 (2019), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2019.1.2
Lucangioli.S. "Acute Renal Failure: An Article Critique." International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology 8.2 (2018), 51-52. https://doi.org/10.31838/ijprt/08.02.07
Lii, P., & Kuo, F.-I. (2016). Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.018
Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-S. (2017). Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), 1663-1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0358-6
Lin, R., Gui, Y., Xie, Z., & Liu, L. (2019). Green governance and international business strategies of emerging economies’ multinational enterprises: A multiple-case study of chinese firms in pollution-intensive industries. Sustainability, 11(4), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041013
Lonial, S. C., & Carter, R. E. (2015). The impact of organizational orientations on medium and small firm performance: A resource‐based perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12054
Ma, Y., Hou, G., & Xin, B. (2017). Green process innovation and innovation benefit: The mediating effect of firm image. Sustainability, 9(10), 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101778
Merino, D., Ludueña, L. N., & Alvarez, V. A. (2018). Dissimilar tendencies of innovative green clay organo-modifier on the final properties of poly (ε-caprolactone) based nanocomposites. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 26(2), 716-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-017-0994-5
Parida, V., Sjödin, D. R., & Lenka, S., Wincent, Joakim. (2015). Developing global service innovation capabilities: How global manufacturers address the challenges of market heterogeneity. Research-Technology Management, 58(5), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308x5805360
Raman, A. (2016). How do social media, mobility, analytics and cloud computing impact nonprofit organizations? A pluralistic study of information and communication technologies in Indian context. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.992002
Sardá, R., & Pogutz, S. (2018). Corporate Sustainability in the 21st Century: Increasing the Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180908
Schubert, T., & Tavassoli, S. (2019). Product Innovation and Educational Diversity in Top and Middle Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal(ja). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0741
Sirkeck, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Application of Green Construction Technology in Construction Management.
Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A., & Abdulrahman, M. (2019). Out-in, in-out buyer quality innovation pathways for new product outcome: Empirical evidence from the Chinese consumer goods industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 207, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.009
Trianni, A., Cagno, E., & Farné, S. (2016). Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: A broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. Applied Energy, 162, 1537-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.078
Wuryaningrat, N., Kindengan, P., & Sendouw, G., Lumanouw, Bode. (2018). Employee Fit, Trust, Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Capabilities: Empirical Study on Indonesia Creative Industry.
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2298
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
