Comparative research of job satisfaction among the doctor personnel in the Russian federation, under conditions of "performance-based contract of employment"
Keywords:
Labour motivation, Health care, Performance-based contract of employment, Labour contract, Material incentives, Employee performance, Labour costs, Incentive payments, Job satisfactionAbstract
Employee satisfaction with work is one of the most important factors in the effectiveness of a health care organization, which contributes to the development of the personnel potential of an institution and has a direct impact on the quality of health care services provided. The purpose of this study is to compare the levels of satisfaction with the work of doctors in Russian and foreign organizations that used a “performance-based contract of employment” with employees. They were requested to consider their overall attitude to their job and the level of satisfaction with such parameters as wages, working conditions and atmosphere in the team. Research findings in Russia indicated that doctors with the highest levels of work satisfaction are in the private section (67%), while doctors in the public and departmental sections have much less levels of satisfaction (59% and 54%). Investigating satisfaction with wages, it was found that doctors working in public institutions have a lower level of satisfaction (60%), compared with doctors working in other types of clinics. Most of the surveyed doctors, in all types of organizations, expressed satisfaction with the team condition in the workplace (70%).Downloads
References
Adams J.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2
Ahmadi, A.K , Mohammad Pour, B , Zamani, B.(2014). Study of relationship between Organizational Culture and Employees Readiness: a Case study of Isfahan University, UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, Issue 2,pp.29-35.
Bodrov V.A. (2007). Job satisfaction as a subjective indicator of professional suitability. The human factor: problems of psychology and ergonomics, 3, 2-9.
Bodur S. (2002). Job Satisfaction of Health Care Staff Employed at Health Centers. Turkey Occupational Medicine, 6, 353-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.6.353
Bogue R.J., et al. (2006). Secrets of Physician Satisfaction. Physician Executive, 32, 30-39.
Bussing A. (2002). Motivation and satisfaction. Human Resource Management.
Cooper C.L., Rout U. and Faragher B. (1989). Mental Health, Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress among General Practitioners. BMJ, 298, 336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6670.366
Dewhurst M., Guthridge M. and Mohr E. (2009). Motivating People: Getting beyond Money. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/motivating-people-getting-beyond-money
Hackman J.R., Oldham G.R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Herzberg F., Mausner B. and Snyderman B.B. (2011). Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, 157.
House R.J., Wigdor L.A. (1967). Herzberg’s Dualfactor Theory of Job Satisfaction and Motivation: A Review of the Evidence and a Criticism. Personnel Psychology, 4, 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1967.tb02440.x
Jex S.M., Britt T.W. (2014). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 706.
Judge T.A., Locke E.A. and Durham C.C. (1997). The Dispositional Causes of Job Satisfaction: A Core Evaluations Approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
Kadyrov F.N. (2013). A new form of employment contract in the framework of the implementation of an effective contract / F.N. Kadyrov // Health Care Manager, № 4, 2013, p. 54 - 59.
Kuznecova A.M. (2013). Influence of priority factors of labor motivation on the choice of professional activities of medical workers.
Locke E.A. (1976). Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychlogy, 1, 1297-1343.
Lysenko I.L., Chirkov V.A., Breusov A.V. and Mazitov M.R. (2014). Qualitative characteristics of medical personnel as the main component of the effectiveness of primary health care. Prakticheskaya Medicina (Health care in practice), 4, 65-68.
Medvedeva L. (2008). Labor satisfaction as a factor in increasing production efficiency. Economic Systems Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, 13, 37-45.
Nikic D., et al. (2008). Job Satisfaction in Health Care Workers. Acta Medica Medianae, 4, 9-12.
Peters, D.H., et al. (2010). Job Satisfaction and Motivation of Health Workers in Public and Private Sectors: Cross-Sectional Analysis from Two Indian States. Human Resources for Health, 8, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-27
Rose M. (1994). Job Satisfaction, Job Skills, and Personal Skills. Penn Retal. Skill and Occupational Change, Oxford, 244-280.
Shkolnikova M., Yugay M. i Pankevich V. (2017). A comparative study of levels of satisfaction with the work of doctors in the public and private sectors in Russia. Scientific journal, 5, 101-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.58008
Silaparasetti, V., Srinivasarao, G., & Khan, F. R. (2017). structural equation modeling analysis using smart pls to assess the occupational health and safety (ohs) factors on workers’ behavior. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 5(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2017.524
Smith P.C., Kendall L.M. and Hulin C.L. (1969). Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Rand Mc Nally, Chicago, IL, 194.
Spector P.E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Yuriev V., Tarhanov, V. (2014). Self-esteem of doctors of various specialties of their social status and professional activities. Modern Problem Science and Education, 2, 310. http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=12498
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
