The human behavioral and practical model of ‘at-risk teacher training’ at Kazan Federal University: Sports and educational environment

Authors

  • Leysan R. Kayumova Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Russian Federation
  • Venera G. Zakirova Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.31

Keywords:

Human behavioural, Practical model, Teacher’s noxological competences, Risk-oriented teacher training

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: Risks have become an integral part of the modern world. Elevated risk levels resulted from an accelerated pace that modern society has developed at, extreme degree of digitalization and informatization of human life. The system of education is therefore challenged by additional tasks to educate future generations for situations of risk. In view of this, this research aims to find and justify a suitable measure to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘at-risk teacher training’ model. The purpose of this empiric study is to examine whether the ‘at-risk teacher training’ model is efficient. Methodology: Beta-testing of the model of ‘at-risk teacher training’ has been run in the Institute of psychology and education at Kazan Federal University since 2013. The research tool used is the questionnaire on coping strategies developed by Heim. Main Findings: According to Russian researchers studying risks, a teacher’s willingness to work in risk situations is defined as the noxological competence. Noxological competence includes situational, motivational, cognitive, active, analytical, and reflexive components. Thus, the performance evaluation of the ‘at-risk teacher training’ model equals assessment of the noxological competence development of teachers. However, there is no single measure that can assess all components of the noxological competencies. According to this view, the authors designed the model of ‘at-risk teacher training’ building on the importance of action competencies in situations of risk which are essential for a professional teaching career in the modern world. Applications of this study: The research helped to identify student teachers’ motivation for communication, behaviour patterns in conflict situations, ability to understand non-verbal communication cues and gestures, which are referred to as essential professional teaching competencies needed to resolve and manage conflict situations. Novelty/Originality of this study: The authors suggested a possible suitable measure to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘at-risk teacher training’ model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramova, I.G. (1996). The theory of pedagogical risks. PhD Thesis, St. Petersburg.

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2015). Social Psychology (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Avdeev, V.A., Avdeeva, O.A., Shagieva, R.V., Smirnova,V.V., Mashkin, N.A., & Taradonov, S.V. (2019). The mechanism of legal regulation in the conditions of globalization and formation of information environment. Regional aspect. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 10(7), 1517-152.

Bayanova, A.R., Vodenko, K.V., Sizova, Zh.M., Chistyakov, A.A., Prokopiev, A.I., & Vasbieva, D.G. (2019). A philosophical view of organizational culture in contemporary universities. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), 121-131.

Belov, S.V., & Simakova, E.N. (2013). The New Direction of Scientific Knowledge - Nohsologiya. Part I. Theoretical Nohsologiya. Life safety, S8, 1-24.

Bespalko, V. P. (1996). Monitoring the quality of education: education management tool. World of Education, 2, 32-36.

Devisilov, V. А. (2011). Noxological aspects of education humanization. Higher education in Russia, 1, 129-132.

Duke, R.D., & Duke, K.M. (1983). Chapter IX:a - Development of the Conrail game. Operational Gaming, 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030870-8.50026-6

Gimaliev, V.G., Prokopyev, A.I., Vershinin, V.P., Ivanova, M.E., Erkibaeva, G.G., Aytuganova, J.I., & Alexandrova, N.S. (2020). Public Relations in Organizations in Student View: Accumulator of Management Tools or Formation of Partnership and Friendly Relations. Journal of environmental treatment techniques, 8(4), 1326-1330. https://doi.org/10.47277/JETT/8(4)1230

Havermans, N., Vanassche, S., & Matthijs, K. (2017). Children's Post-Divorce Living Arrangements and School Engagement: Financial Resources, Parent-Child Relationship, Selectivity and Stress. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(12), 3425-3438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0843-0

Heim, E. (1988). Coping und Adaptivität: Gibt es geeignetes oder ungeeignetes Coping? Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 38(1), 8-18.

Kayumova, L. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2016). Educational Environment Risks: Problems of Identification and Classification. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(6), 1013-1019. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.370a

Kennedy, I. G., Latham, G., Jacinto, H. (2016). Education Skills for 21st Century Teachers. Voices From a Global Online Educators' Forum. 1st ed. SpringerBriefs in Education, 114 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22608-8

Khairullina, E.R., Shubovich, M.M., Bogdanova, V.I., Slepneva, E.V., Mashkin, N.A., & Rodyukova, T.N. (2020). Modern student youth civic identity: Political activity or social responsibility? Opcion, 36(Special Edition 27), 1703-1717.

Kong, Y., Kayumova, L. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2017). Simulation technologies in preparing teachers to deal with risks. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4753-4763. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00962a

Kutuev, R.A., Katicheva, M.G., Rassolov, I.M., Derdizova, F.V., Yevgrafova, O.G., & Kozhanov, I.V. (2016). Practical recommendations on students' tolerant behavior formation in universities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17), 10365-10376.

Makarova, E.V., Kryukova, N.I., Sizova, Z.M., Grinenko, A.V., Erofeeva, M.A., and Bukalerova, L.A. (2019). Divergence of supreme values of Russian world and western civilization social and philosophical analysis. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3), 97-107.

Middlewick, Y., Kettle, T. J., & Wilson, J. J. (2012). Curtains up! Using forum theatre to rehearse the art of communication in healthcare education. Nurse education in practice, 12(3), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.010

Mikhailova, E. N. (2010). Pedagogical risks in research and experimental activities: forcasting and mitigation. World of science, culture, education, 3, 98-100.

Orekhovskaya NA, Chistyakov AA, Kryukova NI, Krokhina JA, Ospennikov YV, Makarova EV (2019) Orthodoxy and modernity their contact facets in Russian society. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(2), 67-77.

Panfilova, A. P. (2006). Game-based modeling of the teacher's work: study guide for university students. Moscow: Academia.

Piralova, O.F., Gerasimenko, S.A., Kuznetsov, V.V., Popova, O.V., Subbotin, G.V., Kolomyts, O.G., & Mashkin, N.A. (2020). Gaming Industry Trends in new Generation Specialist Training in University Environment. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(3), 1132-1135.

Plaksina, I. V. (2004). Interactive technologies in education. Vladimir.

Podymov, N.A., Nikoghosyan, M.A., Stolyarova, A.N., Narutto, S.V., Mashkin, N.A., Martynenko, S.E., Paznikova, Z.I., & Varenik, P.K. (2019). University New Educational Reality in Disruptive Technologies Context. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(4), 664-668.

Prichinin, A. E. (2014) Organizational-methodological conditions for effective risk management in the context of an educational project. Bulletin of Udmurt University, 1, 78-84.

Prokofieva, E.N., Erdyneyeva, K.G., Galushkin, A.A., Prokopyev, A.I., Prasolov, V.I., Ashmarina, S.I., Ilkevich B., & Kubiatko, M. (2018). Risk based ecological economics to engineering students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 753-764. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80903

Razumovskaya, M.I., Larionova, A.A., Zaitseva, N.A., Petrina, O.A, Vinogradova, M.V., Nagay, N.G., Takhumova, O.V. (2019) Models of Integrated Interactions Organization in the Field of Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques (JETT),7(Issue 4): 576-580.

Sabinina, N. N. (2011). Risks in innovative activity of the teacher and their preventive maintenance. World of Science, Culture, Education, 6(1), 85-89.

Shinkevich, M.V., Mashkin, N.A., Ishmuradova, I.I., Kolosova, V.V., & Popova, O.V. (2020). Management of sustainable consumption of energy resources in the conditions of digital transformation of the industrial complex. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5), 454-460. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10202

Zyubina, I.A., Dzyubenko, A.I., Borisenko, V.A., Popova, O.V., & Prokopyev, A.I. (2019). Implicit Linguopragmatic strategies of speech behavior of English-speaking prosecutors. XLinguae, 12(4), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.04.08

Statistics

Statistics RUA

Published

2021-09-01

How to Cite

Kayumova, L. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2021). The human behavioral and practical model of ‘at-risk teacher training’ at Kazan Federal University: Sports and educational environment. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(3proc), S1151-S1161. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc3.31