Validation of the Satisfaction Questionnaire with physical education classes (CSCEF) in the Latin American context

Authors

  • Diego Rafael La Rotta Higher Institute of Teacher Training Salome Ureña Public University of Navarra, Dominican Republic
  • Roberto Ferriz University of Zaragoza, Spain
  • Daniel Lara Higher Institute of Teacher Training Salome Ureña, Dominican Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.163.12

Keywords:

Scholar satisfaction, Adherence to physical education class, Multidimensional psychometric model

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate the Satisfaction Questionnaire in Physical Education Classes (CSCEF) in the context of Latin America (Dominican Republic). 1298 students aged between 15 and 21 participated. The psychometric properties of the instrument were analysed. The results demonstrated that the best factor solution would be a multidimensional model represented by nine dimensions for the satisfaction construct, as well as a higher-order model. According to Cronbach's alpha and omega index, values between .66 and .99 were obtained. The Latin American version of the CSCEF was invariant with respect to gender. Although the results of this study support the validity and reliability of the instrument, some limitations identified in both the original and Spanish version of the questionnaire remain.

Funding

ISFODOSU

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfaro, J., Guzmán, J., Reyes, F., García, C., Varela, J., & Sirlopú, D. (2016). Satisfacción global con la vida y satisfacción escolar en estudiantes chilenos. Psykhe (Santiago), 25(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.25.2.842

Baena-Extremera, A., & Granero-Gallegos, A. (2015). Prediction model of Satisfaction with physical education and school. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1387/revpsicodidact.11268

Baños, R., Ortiz-Camacho, M. D. M., Baena-Extremera, A., & Tristán-Rodríguez, J. L. (2017). Satisfacción, motivación y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de Secundaria y Bachillerato: antecedentes, diseño, metodología y propuesta de análisis para un trabajo de investigación. https://doi.org/10.25115/ecp.v10i20.1011

Baños R, Baena-Extremera A and Ortiz-Camacho M (2019) Prediction of the Satisfaction With the Student Life, Based on Teaching Competence and Satisfaction With the School. Front. Psychol. 10:2506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02506

Briones, E., & Tabernero, C. (2012). Social cognitive and demographic factors related to adolescents’ intrinsic satisfaction with school. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 219-232. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9176-4

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/62519

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600219

Castillo, I., Balaguer, I., & Duda, J. L. (2001). Perspectivas de meta de los adolescentes en el contexto académico. Psicothema, 13(1), 79-86.

Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of the facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal of Sport Management, 11, 133-159. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.11.2.133

Cunningham, G. B. (2007). Development of the physical activity class satisfaction questionnaire (PACSQ). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 11(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670701326443

Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290

Ferriz, R., González‐Cutre, D., Sicilia, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Predicting healthy and unhealthy behaviors through physical education: A self‐determination theory‐based longitudinal approach. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 26(5), 579-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12470

Ferriz, R., Sicilia, A., & Sáenz-Álvarez, P. (2013). Predicting satisfaction in physical education classes: A study based on self-determination theory. The Open Education Journal, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920820130705001

Guess, P. E., & McCane-Bowling, S. J. (2016). Teacher support and life satisfaction: an investigation with urban, middle school students. Education and Urban Society, 48(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513514604

Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muñiz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 207-238). Madrid: Universitas.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Lozano, J. J. M., Ortega, M. V., & Tristancho, S. L. Z. (2015). Validez de instrumento para medir la calidad de vida en la juventud: VIHDA. Revista Logos, Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(1), 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v7i1.225

McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34(1), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1981.tb00621.x

Muñoz González, V.; Gómez-López, M., & Granero-Gallegos, A. (2019). Relación entre la satisfacción con las clases de Educación Física, su importancia y utilidad y la intención de práctica del alumnado de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista Complutense de Educación, 30 (2), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.57678

Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents' theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 683-692. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.6.683

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. Nueva York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Prieto, G., & Muñiz, J. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del psicólogo, (77), 65-72.

Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1998). Development of the athelete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(2), 127-156. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.20.2.127

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sicilia, A., Ferriz, R., Trigueros, R., & González-Cutre, D. (2014). Adaptación y validación española del Physical Activity Class Satisfaction Questionnaire (PACSQ). Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.ayve

Treasure, D. C., & Roberts, G. C. (1994). Cognitive and affective concomitants of task and ego orientations during middle school years. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.16.1.15

Treasure, D. C., & Roberts, G. C. (1998). Relationship between female adolescents' achievement goal orientations, perceptions of motivational climate, belief about success and sources of satisfaction in basketball. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(3), 211-230.

Ulstad, S. O., Halvari, H., Sørebø, Ø., & Deci, E. L. (2016). Motivation, learning strategies, and performance in physical education at secondary school. Advances in Physical Education, 6, 27-41. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2016.61004

Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625-627.

Downloads

Statistics

Statistics RUA

Published

01-07-2021

How to Cite

La Rotta, D. R., Ferriz, R., & Lara, D. (2021). Validation of the Satisfaction Questionnaire with physical education classes (CSCEF) in the Latin American context. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(3), 627–639. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.163.12

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.

Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.

Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.

This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Transfer of Copyright

In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.

Competing Interests

Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.

JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.