The serve clock reduced rule violations, but did not speed up the game: A closer look at the inter-point time at the 2018 US Open
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.163.05Keywords:
Time rule, Umpiring, Serve clock, Technological officiating aids, TennisAbstract
After treating time rule violations as a trivial offense over the past, tennis associations in 2018 permanently introduced an on-court serve clock to make sure that players do not exceed the time limit between points. In this study, we investigated the influence of this technological officiating aid at its first use in Grand Slam tennis at the 2018 US Open. By investigating time intervals between 2135 points at the Men’s single tournament we found that the share of rule violations decreased (26.3%), but the average time did not (21.6s) compared to previous studies. We could further confirm that the players still use this time interval for tactical reasons and to recover after longer rallies. In addition, the umpires, which do not show any reputation bias, have a significant influence on the inter-point time as well. Based on these findings we suggest introducing a serve clock that is started automatically. Further, we argue that a dynamic time limit, which takes the intensity of the previous rally into account, would be more appropriate. Players could be granted more time for recovery after longer rallies, but less time after shorter ones in order to reach the intended goals regarding pace of play.
Downloads
References
Arias, J. L., Argudo, F. M., & Alonso, J. I. (2011). Review of rule modification in sport. J Sport Sci Med, 10(1), 1–8.
ATP. (2018). USTA, ATP & WTA Implement Rules Innovations At Events Throughout Summer. Retrieved from https://www.atptour.com/en/news/shot-clock-implemented-in-us-summer-swing-2018
ATP. (2019). The 2019 ATP® Official Rulebook. Retrieved from https://www.atptour.com/-/media/files/rulebook/2019/2019-atp-rulebook_02may.pdf
Berman, M. N. (2010). Let’em Play: A Study in the Jurisprudence of Sport. Geo. LJ, 99, 1325–1369.
Dohmen, T., & Sauermann, J. (2016). Referee Bias. J Econ Surv, 30(4), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12106
Grand Slam Board. (2019). Official Grand Slam® Rule Book. Retrieved from https://www.itftennis.com/media/1236/2019-grand-slam-rule-book.pdf
Halldorsson, V. (2016). Coaches Use of Team Timeouts in Handball: A Mixed Method Analysis. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 9(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X01609010143
ITF. (2019). ITF Rules of Tennis. Retrieved from https://www.itftennis.com/media/298557/298557.pdf
Kim, J. W., & King, B. G. (2014). Seeing Stars: Matthew Effects and Status Bias in Major League Baseball Umpiring. Manage Sci, 60(11), 2619–2644. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1967
Kolbinger, O., Großmann, S., & Lames, M. (2019). A closer look at the prevalence of time rule violations and the inter-point time in men’s Grand Slam tennis. Journal of Sports Analytics, 5(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.3233/JSA-180277
Kolbinger, O., & Lames, M. (2017). Scientific approaches to technological officiating aids in game sports. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 2:001. https://doi.org/10.15203/CISS_2017.001
Kolbinger, O., & Stöckl, M. (2019). Misbehavior During Penalty Kicks and Goalkeepers Holding the Ball Too Long as Trivial Offenses in Football. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:844. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00844
Kovalchik, S. (2018). Why the tennis “serve clock” may be a waste of time. Significance, 15(4), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2018.01173.x
Kovalchik, S. A., & Albert, J. (2017). A multilevel Bayesian approach for modeling the time-to-serve in professional tennis. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 13(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2016-0091
Maquirriain, J., Baglione, R., & Cardey, M. (2016). Male professional tennis players maintain constant serve speed and accuracy over long matches on grass courts. Eur J Sport Sci, 16(7), 845–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1156163
Mills, B. M. (2014). Social Pressure at the Plate: Inequality Aversion, Status, and Mere Exposure. Manage Decis Econ, 35(6), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2630
O’Donoghue, P. D., & Liddle, S. D. (1998). A Notational Analysis of Time Factors of Elite Mens and Ladies Singles Tennis on Clay and Grass Surfaces. In A. Lees, I. Maynard, M. Hughes, & T. Reilly (Eds.), Science and Racket Sports II (pp. 241–246). London: E & FN Spon.
Parsons, C. A., Sulaeman, J., Yates, M. C., & Hamermesh, D. S. (2011). Strike Three: Discrimination, Incentives, and Evaluation. Am Econ Rev, 101(4), 1410–1435. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1410
Pollard, G., & Noble, K. (2002). The Characteristics of Some New Scoring Systems in Tennis. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport (pp. 221–226). Australia: University of Technology, Sydney.
Simmonds, E., & O’Donoghue, P. (2018). Probabilistic models comparing Fast4 and traditional tennis. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 17(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2018-0008
Standen, J. (2013). Foot faults in crunch time: Temporal variance in sports law and antitrust regulation. Pepp. L. Rev., 41, 349–396.
USA Today Sports. (2018). Citi Open implements shot clock, emulates MLB in desire to improve pace of play. Retrieved from https://eu.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/2018/07/31/tennis-shot-clock-follows-mlb-wish-speed-up-play/874161002/
WTA. (2019). WTA Official Rulebook. Retrieved from http://wtafiles.wtatennis.com/pdf/publications/2019WTARulebook.pdf
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
