The aesthetics of the experts - On the relationship of observers’ and performers’ expertise when perceiving motion aesthetics in freerunning skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.174.06Keywords:
Biological motion perception, Empirical aesthetics, Likert-scales, Artistic sportsAbstract
An observer’s perception of motion aesthetics strongly relies on the interplay between aspects of the motion stimuli, the sensory and motor expertise of the observer, and the context in which the stimuli are perceived. However, whether a fit in observers’ and performers’ sensory and motor expertise can boost aesthetic motion perception when observing complex motor skills, is still to be investigated. Thus, it was hypothesized that a fit between observers’ and performers’ sensory and motor expertise could boost aesthetic motion perception of complex motor skills. Expert and intermediate freerunners performed three different freerunning skills. Observers with varying levels of expertise were asked to indicate their perception of motion aesthetics when observing video sequences of expert and intermediate freerunning skill performances. Results indicate that a fit between observers’ and performers’ sensory and motor expertise levels does not boost aesthetic motion perception. In contrast, motor skill performances of expert freerunners are perceived as more aesthetically than intermediate freerunning performances from all three observer groups: expert freerunning observers, intermediate freerunning observers, and laypeople. Instead of a fit between the performer’s and the observer’s sensory and motor expertise, it is argued that object-driven parameters of a complex motor skill performance seem to be related to a rather universal embodied aesthetic motion perception.
Funding
Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen UniversityDownloads
References
Aglioti, S. M., Minio-Paluello, I., & Candini, M. (2012). The beauty of the body. Rend Fis Acc Lincei, 23, 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-012-0169-1
Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annu Rev Psychol, 58, 47-73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190152
Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2018). Aesthetics. Curr Biol, 28(16), 859-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.004
Bronner, S., & Shippen, J. (2015). Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance. Exp Brain Res, 233, 3565-3581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4
Calvo-Merino, B., Ehrenberg, S., Leung, D. M. H., & Haggard, P. (2010). Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation. Psychol Res, 74(4), 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi007
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E., & Haggard, P. (2008). Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Conscious Cogn, 17, 911-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003
Candini, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015). Visual and sensorimotor contribution to the esthetic appraisal of body form, motion, and emotion. Eur Psychol, 20(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000221
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends Cogn Sci, 18(7), 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
Christensen, J. F., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2013). Dance as a subject for empirical aesthetics. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts, 7(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031827
Cross, E., Kirsch, L., Ticini, L. F., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2011). The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Front Hum Neurosci, 5, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
Cutting, J. E. (2006). The mere exposure effect and aesthetic preference. In P. Locher, C. Martindale, & L. Dorfman (Eds.). New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of art. (pp. 33-46). Baywood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315224084-4
Di Dio, C., & Gallese, V. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: a review. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 19, 682-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001
FIG (2019). 2019-2021 Code of Points – Parkour. Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique. https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_PK%20Code%20of%20Points%202019-2021.pdf
Iglesias Gallego, D., Garcia Gonzales, L., Garcia Calvo, T., Del Barco, B. L., & Del Villar Álvarez, F. (2010). Expertise development in sport: contributions under cognitive psychology perspective. J Hum Sport Exerc, 5(3), 462-475. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2010.53.16
Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences. A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155
Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Köhler, M., & Schröger, E. (2004). The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychol Rep, 94, 1253-1260. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1253-1260
Jola, C., Abedian-Amiri, A., Kuppuswamy, A., Pollick, F. E., & Grosbras, M-H. (2012). Motor simulation without motor expertise: enhanced corticospinal excitability in visually experienced dance spectators. PLoS One, 7(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033343
Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M. S., & Zeki, S. (2009). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44, 1125-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009
Kirsch, L. P., Drommelschmidt, K. A., Cross, E. S. (2013). The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Front Hum Neurosci, 7(521), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521
Kirsch, L. P., Urgesi, C., & Cross, E. S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neurosci Biobehav R, 62, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005
Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: the aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. Br J Psychol, 105, 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
Leiner, D. J. (2018). SoSci Survey (Version 3.0.00) [Computer software]. Available at https://www.soscisurvey.de
Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. J Exp Psychol Human, 31(1), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.210
Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: the influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
Montero, B. (2012). Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge. Phenom Cogn Sci, 11, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9236-9
Orgs, G., Calvo-Merino, B., & Cross, E (2018). Knowing dance or knowing how to dance? Sources of expertise in aesthetic appreciation of human movement. In B. Bläsing, M. Puttke, & T. Schack (Eds.). The neurocognition of dance: mind, movement, and motor skill (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726410-13
Orgs, G., Hagura, N., & Haggard, P. (2013). Learning to like it: aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Conscious Cogn, 22, 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annu Rev Psychol, 64, 77-107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504
Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspect Psychol Sci, 11(2), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: the Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Phys Life Rev, 21, 80-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art - A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J Conscious Stud, 6(6-7), 15-51.
Redies, C. (2015). Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Front Hum Neurosci, 9(218). 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00218
Sato, N., Nunome, H., & Ikegami, Y. (2014). Key features of hip hop dance motions affect evaluation by judges. J Appl Biomech, 30, 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2013-0190
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2017). Motor control and learning (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
Seidel, A., & Prinz, J. (2018). Great works: a reciprocal relationship between spatial magnitudes and aesthetic judgement. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts, 12(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000100
Stevens, C., Winskel, H., Howell, C., Vidal, L.-M., Latimer, C., & Milne-Home, J. (2010). Perceiving dance: schematic expectations guide experts’ scanning of a contemporary dance film. J Dance Med Sci, 14(1), 19-25.
Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2015). Research methods in physical activity (7th ed.). Human Kinetics.
Ticini, L. F., Urgesi, C., Calvo-Merino, B. (2014). Embodied aesthetic: insight from cognitive neuroscience of the performing arts. In A. Scarinzi (ed.). Aesthetics and the embodied mind: beyond art theory and the cartesian mind-body dichotomy. (pp 103-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_7
Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2009). Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychol, 130, 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001
Vinken, P. M., & Heinen, T. (2020). Perceived aesthetic features differentiating between complex artistic dance skills of varying style. Sci Gymnast J, 12(2), 119-113.
Witfield, J., Gerling, I. E., & Pach, A (2013). The ultimate parkour and freerunning book. Meyer & Meyer.
Zamparo, P., Carrara, S., & Cesari, P. (2017). Movement evaluation of front crawl swimming: technical skill versus aesthetic quality. PLoS One, 12(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184171
Zamparo, P., Zorzi, E., Marcantoni, S., & Cesari, P. (2015). Is beauty in the eyes of the beholder? Aesthetic quality versus technical skill in movement evaluation of Tai Chi. PLoS One, 10(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128357
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
