The managerial capacity of physical education teachers - principals: The case of Greece

Athanasios Αlatzoglou, Ioannis Athanailidis, Athanasios Laios, Vassiliki Derri

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to identify and compare the management skills that relate to school efficacy of Physical Education Teachers (PETs) who work as junior and senior high school principals. A total number of 580 teachers of 12 junior high schools and 12 senior high schools participated. The teachers rated their principals’ skills using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale-PIMRS, after being adapted to the Greek reality. Independent samples t-test was used for data analysis. Results showed statistically significant differences between junior and senior high school principals in certain managerial skills. Specifically, senior high school teachers believe, more than their junior high school colleagues, that their principals demonstrate school management skills concerning a) parent involvement, b) professional development, and c) curriculum. Contrary to that, the two groups of teachers presented no significantly different perceptions of their principals’ skills on a) student progress and b) school climate factors. These findings could be used in improving school effectiveness as well as today’s and future school principals’ managerial capacity in different school level.


Keywords

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL, SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS, ADMINISTRATION, LEADERSHIP, HIGH SCHOOL

References


Barnett, K., McCormick, J. & Conners, R. (2001). Transformational leadership in schools. Panacea, placebo or problem? Journal of Educational Administration, 39(1): 24-46.

Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5): 662-683.

Bolam, R. (2005). Models of leadership development: learning from international experience and research. London: Sage Publishin.

Blasé, J. & Blasé, J. 1998. Handbook of Instructional Leadership: how really good principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Brown, K., Anfara, V. A., Hartman, K. J., Mahar, R. J. & Mills, R. (2002). Professional development of middle level principals: Pushing the reform forward, In: Lumby, J., Crow, G. & Pashiardis, P. (2008). International Hand book on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders. New York: Routledge.

Bush, T. & Jackson, D. 2002. A preparation for school leadership: International perspectives. Educational Management and Administration, 30(4): 417-429.

Derri, V., Vasiliadou, O. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. 2015. The effects of a short-term professional development program on physical education teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2): 234-262.

Eliophotou-Menon, M., Papanastasiou, E. & Zempylas, M. 2008. Examining the relationship of job satisfaction to teacher and organizational variables: evidence from Cyprus. Journal of the Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management, 36(3): 75-86.

Emmanouilidou, K., Derri, V., Antoniou, P. & Kyrgiridis, P. 2012. Comparison between synchronous and asynchronous instructional delivery method of training programme on in-service physical educators’ knowledge. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(4): 193-208.

Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change, (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

Georgogiannis, P., Lagios, V. & Kouneli, V. 2005. Administrative competence and readiness of school principals, In P. Georgogiannis (Ed.), Administration of Primary and Secondary Education schools 2nd Pan-Hellenic Congress, Patras.

Gkousia-Rizou, M. 2002. Gymnasium Principals: The steps they deem necessary in order to fulfil their role in the future. Proceedings of the 3rd Pan-Hellenic Congress of the Hellenic Educational Society.“Greek Pedagogical and Educational Research”]. In N. Zoukis & Th. Mitakos (Eds). Athens, 7-9 November.

Hallinger, P. 1982, 1983, 1990. Principal instructional management rating scale. Version 2.3. Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates.

Hallinger, P. (1983). Assessing the instructional management behaviour of principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. 1985. Assessing the instructional leadership behaviour of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2): 217-248.

Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. 1998. Exploring the principals’ contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 9(2): 157-191.

Hallinger, P. 2008. Methodologies for studying school leadership: A review of 25 years of research using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ΑΕRA), New York.

Hallinger, P. 2011. A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2): 271-306.

Hallinger, P., Chung Wang, W. & Wen Chen, C. 2013. Assessing the measurement properties of the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A meta-analysis of reliability studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1): 272-309.

Harris, A. 2003. Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: heresy, fantasy or possibility. School Leadership & Management, 23(3): 313-324.

Hoy, W. & Miskel, C. 2005. Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (7th ed.). New York: The McGraw – Hill Companies.

Iordanidis, G., & Tsagalidou, M. 2002.Management of school unit and personnel motivation].

Krug, S. 1992. Instructional leadership: a constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3): 430-443.

Kyrgiridis, P., Derri, V., Emmanouilidou, K., Chlapoutaki, E. & Kioumourtzoglou, E. 2014. Development of a questionnaire for self-evaluation of teacher effectiveness in physical education (SETEQ-PE). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 18(2): 73-90. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2013.866557

Law 1268/1982 (Government Gazette A 87 /16-07-1982) on the structure and operation of Higher Education Institutions.

Law 2057/1939 (Government Gazette 469/04.11.1939) on the establishment of the National Academy of Physical Education.

Legislative Decree 410/1970 (Government Gazette 14/20.01.1970) on the establishment of a branch of the National Academy of Physical Education (EASA) in Thessaloniki

Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. 1997. Explaining variation in teachers’ perception of principals’ leadership: A replication. Journal of Educational Administration, 35: 312-331.

Linn, G.B., Sherman, R. & Gill, P.B. 2007. Making Meaning of Educational Leadership.

The Principalship in Metaphor, National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) Bulletin 91(2): 161-171.

Melissopoulos, S. 2006. The selection of the principal of the school unit . Thessaloniki: Kyriakidi Α.Ε.

O’Day, K. 1983. The relationship between principal and teacher perceptions of principal instructional management behaviour and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, USA.

Omoregie, N.Y. 1995. A study of situational and environmental determinates of leadership effectiveness of secondary school principals in Edo State. M.Ed Thesis Benin: University of Benin.

Oyewole, B.K. 2013. Situational factors and principals’ administrative effectiveness in Ondo and Ekiti States, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(1): 211-216.

Pamouktsoglou, A. 2001.“Effective School: characteristics and views in an effort to evaluate it”]. Epitheorisi Ekpaideftikon Thematon (Educational Review Journal) 5: 81-91.

Pashiardi, G. 2000. School climate in elementary and secondary school: Views of Cypriot principals and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5): 224-237.

Pashiardis, P. & Orphanou, S. 1999. An Insight Into Primary Principalship in Cyprus: The

Teachers’ Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 13: 241-251.

Pashiardis, P. 2004. Educational leadership – from the time of favourable indifference to the contemporary period]. Athens: Metaichmio Publications.

Pedagogical Institute – Major In-Service Training Programme. 2010. Study identifying in-service training needs.

Rhodes, C. & Brundrett, M. 2009. Leadership development and school improvement. Educational Review, 61(4): 361-374.

Rhodes, C., Brundrett, M. & Nevill, A. 2008. Leadership Talent Identification and Development: Perceptions of Heads, Middle Leaders and Classroom Teachers in 70 Contextually Different Primary and Secondary Schools in England. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(3): 331-335.

Saiti, A. 2007. Main Factors of job satisfaction among primary school educators: factor

analysis of the Greek reality. Management in Education, 21(2): 23-27.

Saitis, C. & Eliophotou, M. 2004. Views of future and current teachers on the Effectiveness of Primary School Leadership: Evidence from Greece. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(2): 135-157.

Stravakou, P. 2003. The principal of the school unit of primary and secondary education, theoretical analysis and empirical investigation. Thessaloniki:Kyriakidi A.E.

Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P. & May, H. 2010. How Principals and Peers Influence Teaching and Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1): 31–56.

Taraseina, P. 1993. Assessing Instructional leadership behavior of secondary school principals in Thailand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Peabody College for teachers of Vanderbilt, University Nashville, USA.

Theofilidis, C., & Stylianidis, M. 2002. Shortages in the administration of primary schools on Cyprus]. Periodiko Paidiki Epitheorisi [journal] 33: 137-156.

Wahlstrom, K.L. & Louis, K.S. 2008. How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4): 458-495.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.123.18