Anthropometric and motor characteristics of adolescence male and female rowers, their relationship with performance and their importance in selection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.184.11

Keywords:

Performance analysis of sport, Rowing, Motor tests, Ergometer start test, Maximal power, Average power

Abstract

The aim of our study is to analyse the physical characteristics and motor tests that can qualify rowers of different genders and nations. Young rowers from six nations (n = 190) were included in the study. After the anthropometric measurements, the average power (W100m) and maximum power (W5 strokes) were examined with start tests on a rowing ergometer. The estimated relative aerobic capacity (ErVO2max) was calculated, and the standing triple jump test (STJ) was also measured. The relationship of the individual variables to performance was also investigated. Analysing the start tests, the results of the boy group were significantly larger than those of the girl group (p < .05). The correlation between STJ and W5 strokes and W100m is significant in the boy group and also in the girl group. The correlation between body weight (BW) and performance is stronger in both groups. In our study, the differences between the sexes are clear, considering all groups, we can observe the tendency that the increasing value of STJ means also increasing of maximum (W5 strokes) and average power (W100m), and we found a relationship between anthropometrical characteristics and performance already in adolescence. It seems clear that in order to achieve a high level of rowing performance, in addition to developing endurance, attention should also be paid to the development of power (especially dynamic leg power) in the program of rowers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikari, A. (2015). Anthropometric Characteristic, Somatotype and Body Composition of Canadian Female Rowers. Am. J. Sports Sci., 3(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20150303.15

Akça, F. (2014). Prediction of Rowing Ergometer Performance from Functional Anaerobic Power, Strength and Anthropometric Components. J. Hum. Kinetics, 41(1), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2014-0041

Alföldi, Z., Borysławski, K., Ihász, F., Soos, I., & Podstawski, R. (2021). Differences in the Anthropometric and Physiological Profiles of Hungarian Male Rowers of Various Age Categories, Rankings and Career Lengths: Selection Problems. Front. Physiol., 12, 747781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.747781

Bourdin, M., Lacour, J. R., Imbert, C., & Messonnier, L. A. (2017). Factors of Rowing Ergometer Performance in High-Level Female Rowers. Int. J. Sports Med , 38(13), 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118849

Bourgois, J. (2000). Anthropometric characteristics of elite male junior rowers. Br. J. Sports. Med., 34(3), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.34.3.213

Cerasola, D., Bellafiore, M., Cataldo, A., Zangla, D., Bianco, A., Proia, P., . . . Capranica, L. (2020). Predicting the 2000‐m Rowing Ergometer Performance from Anthropometric, Maximal Oxygen Uptake and 60‐s Mean Power Variables in National Level Young Rowers. J. Hum. Kinet., 75(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2020-0038

Cosgrove, M. J., Wilson, J., Watt, D., & Grant, S. F. (1999). The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometer test. J. Sports Sci., 17(11), 845-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365407

Durkalec-Michalski, K., Nowaczyk, P. M., Podgórski, T., Kusy, K., Osiński, W., & Jeszka, J. (2019). Relationship between body composition and the level of aerobic and anaerobic capacity in highly trained male rowers. J. sports med. phys. fitness, 59(9), 1526-1535. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.08951-5

Forjasz, J. (2011). Anthropometric Typology of Male and Female Rowers Using K-Means Clustering. J. Hum. Kinet., 28(2011), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0032-y

Huang, C.-J., Nesser, T., & Edwards, J. (2007). Strength and Power Determinants of Rowing Performance. J. Exerc. Physiol. Online, 10, 43-50.

Ingham, S. A., Carter, H., Whyte, G. P., & Doust, J. H. (2008). Physiological and Performance Effects of Low- versus Mixed-Intensity Rowing Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815ecc6a

Kleshnev, V. (2002b). Segments contribution to the stroke length and rower power. Higher percentage of the trunk power helps to achieve higher boat speed. Rowing Biomech. Newsletters, 2(2).

Lawton, T. W., Cronin, J. B., & Mcguigan, M. R. (2011). Strength Testing and Training of Rowers. Sports Med., 41(5), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.2165/11588540-000000000-00000

Maciejewski, H., Rahmani, A., Chorin, F., Lardy, J., Samozino, P., & Ratel, S. (2019). Methodological Considerations on the Relationship Between the 1,500-m Rowing Ergometer Performance and Vertical Jump in National-Level Adolescent Rowers. J. Strength Cond. Res., 33(11). https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002406

Maestu, J., Jürimae, J., & Jürimae, T. (2005). Monitoring of Performance and Training in Rowing. Sports Med., 35(7), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535070-00005

Majumdar, P., Das, A., & Mandal, M. (2017). Physical and strength variables as a predictor of 2000 m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers J Phys Educ Sport, 17(4), 2502-2507. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.04281

Mikulić, P. (2008). Anthropometric and physiological profiles of rowers of varying ages and ranks. Kinesiology, 40, 80-88.

Mikulic, P. (2009). Anthropometric and Metabolic Determinants of 6,000-m Rowing Ergometer Performance in Internationally Competitive Rowers. J. Strength Cond. Res., 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3dc7e

Mikulić, P., & Ružić, L. (2008). Predicting the 1000m rowing ergometer performance in 12-13-year- old rowers: The basis for selection process? J. Sci. Med. Sport, 11(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.01.008

Nevill, A. M., Beech, C., Holder, R. L., & Wyon, M. (2010). Scaling concept II rowing ergometer performance for differences in body mass to better reflect rowing in water. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 20(1), 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00874.x

Penichet-Tomás, A., Pueo, B., & Jiménez-Olmedo, J. M. (2019). Physical performance indicators in traditional rowing championships. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness, 59, 767-773. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08524-9

Secher, N. (1993). Physiological and Biomechanical Aspects of Rowing. Sports Med. (Auckland, N.Z.), 15, 24-42. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199315010-00004

Smith, T. B., & Hopkins, W. G. (2011). Variability and predictability of finals times of elite rowers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 43(11), 2155-2160. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821d3f8e

Tittel, K., & Wurtscherk, H. (1992). Anatomical and anthopometric fundamentals of endurance. In R. J. Shepard & P. O. Åstrand (Eds.), Endurance in sport (pp. 35-45). Hoboken: Blackwell Scientifc Publications.

Volianitis, S., & Secher, N. (2009). Rowing, the ultimate challenge to the human body - Implications for physiological variables. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging, 29, 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2009.00867.x

Volianitis, S., Yoshiga, C. C., & Secher, N. H. (2020). The physiology of rowing with perspective on training and health. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 120(9), 1943-1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04429-y

Weiner, J. E. S. S., & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Human biology: a guide to field methods. Oxford; Edinburgh: Published for the International Biological Programme by Blackwell Scientific.

Yoshiga, C. C., & Higuchi, M. (2003). Rowing performance of female and male rowers. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 13(5), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00321.x

Yoshiga, C., Kawakami, Y., Fukunaga, T., Okamura, K., & Higuchi, M. (2000). (Originals) Anthropometric and Physiological Factors Predicting 2000 m Rowing Ergometer Performance Time. Adv. Exerc. Sports Physiol., 6.

Yusof, A. A. M., Harun, M. N., Nasruddin, F. A., & Syahrom, A. (2020). Rowing Biomechanics, Physiology and Hydrodynamic: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1231-5268

Anthropometric and motor characteristics of adolescence male and female rowers, their relationship with performance and their importance in selection

Downloads

Statistics

Statistics RUA

Published

2023-07-24

How to Cite

Suszter, L., Barthalos, I., Fügedi, B., & Ihász, F. (2023). Anthropometric and motor characteristics of adolescence male and female rowers, their relationship with performance and their importance in selection. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 18(4), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2023.184.11

Issue

Section

Performance Analysis of Sport