Offensive and defensive team performance: Relation to successful and unsuccessful participation in the 2010 Soccer World Cup
Keywords:Soccer, Game-Related statistics, Scoring effectiveness, First goal effect, Match analysis
The present study was conducted to analyze the impact of selected offensive and defensive performance indicators in relation to teams’ success in the 2010 soccer World Cup. The sample used corresponded to 54 matches played in both the group and knockout stage. The game-related statistics gathered were: total shots, shots on goal, shots off goal, % of shots on goal from total shots , % of shots off goal from total shots, offensive and defensive effectiveness 1 (goals /total shots), and offensive and effectiveness 2 (goals/shots on goal). In addition, the first’s goal influence in the match’s outcome (for the team scoring the goal: win, draw, lose) was also investigated. The results showed that, during the group stage, successful teams had better values (P <0.05) in all offensive and defensive performance indicators, with the exception of shots off goal for and shots off goal against, respectively, than unsuccessful teams. In the knockout stage, successful teams were able to maintain the same offensive performance that in the group stage while most defensive performance indicators, with the exception of shots off goal against (P=0.80), tended (P<0.2) to worsen. During the group stage, the team scoring the first goal had 66.7% of victories, 4.2% of defeats and 29.2% of draws (P<0.001). In the knockout stage, the first goal effect had a stronger influence in game’s outcome than in the group stage (P<0.01) since in 81.3% of the cases the team scoring first won the match, versus 6.3% of defeats and 12.5% of draws. Thus, offensive variables related to shots on goal and goal effectiveness appear to be better indicators of team’s success in the last World Cup than defensive variables. This information has directly implications for coaches, providing relevant feedback to plan finishing (goal scoring) practices.
Abt, G.A., Dickson, G. and Mummery, W.K. (1999) Goal scoring patterns over the course of a match: an analysis of the australian national soccer league. In: Science and Football IV Ed: Spinks, W., Reilly, T. and Murphy, A., London: E&FN Spon. 106-111.
Armatas, V. and Yiannakos, A. (2010) Analysis and evaluation of goals scored in 2006 World Cup. Journal of Sport and Health Research 2, 119-128.
Armatas, V., Yiannakos, A., Papadopoulou, S. and Skoufas, D. (2009) Evaluation of goals scored in top leveled soccer matches in Greek "SuperLeague" 2006-07. Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences 3, 39-43.
Armatas, V., Yiannakos, A. and Sileloglou, P. (2007) Relationship between time and goal scoring in soccer games: Analysis of three World Cups. International Journal of Performance Analysis of Sport 7, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868396
Bishovets, A., Gadjiev, G. and Godik, M. (1993) Computer analysis of the effectiveness of collective technical and tactical moves in the matches of 1988 Olympics and 1990 World Cup. In: Science and Football II Ed: E & FN Spon. 232-236.
Grant, A., Williams, A.M., Lee, D., Dand Reilly, J. and (1998) Match Analysis of Previous World Cups (1986-1994). Insight 4, 20-21.
Grant, A., Williams, A.M., Lee, D. and Reilly, J. (1999) Analysis of goals scored in the FA league in the season 1997-98 and the 1998 World Cup. Insight 4, 20-21.
Horn, R., Williams, A.M. and Grant, A. (2000) Analysis of France in World Cup 1998 And Euro 2000. Insight 1, 40-43.
Hughes, M.D. and Franks, I.M. (2005) Possession length and goal-scoring in soccer. J Sports Sci 23, 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001716779
Lago, C., Lago, J., Dellal, A. and Gómez, M. (2010a) Game-related statistics that discriminated winning, drawing and losing teams from the Spanish soccer league. Int J Sports Med 9, 288-293.
Lago, C., Lago, J., Dellal, A. and Gómez, M. (2010b) Game-related statistics that discriminated winning, drawing and losing teams from the Spanish soccer league. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 9, 288-293.
Low, D., Taylor, S. and Williams, M. (2002) Analysis of the Successful and Unsuccessful Teams of the 2002 World Cup. Insight 1, 32-34.
Luhtanen, P. (1992) Statistical assessment of EURO 92 in Sweden. Bulletin Officiel de L' UEFA 141, 18-21.
Luhtanen, P., Korhonen, V. and Ilkka, A. (1997) A new notational analysis system with special reference to the comparison of Brazil and its opponents in the World Cup 1994. In: Science and Football Ed: Reilly, T., Bangsbo, J. and Hughes, M., London: E & FN Spon. 229-232.
Reep, C. and Benjamin, B. (1968) Skill and chance in association football. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 134, 581-585. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343726
Ridder, G., Cramer, J.S. and Hopstaken, P. (1994) Down to ten: Estimating the effect of a red card in soccer. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 1124–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476850
Suzuki, K. and Nishijima, T. (2004) Validity of a soccer defending scale (SDS) using game performance.International Journal of Sport and Health Science 2, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.5432/ijshs.2.34
Szwarc, A. (2004) Effectiveness of Brazilian and German teams and the teams defeated by them during the 17th FIFA World Cup. Kinesiology 36, 83-89.
Szwarc, A. (2007) Efficacy of Soccer Teams in Finals of Champions League. MEDSPORTPRESS 13, 221-225.
Taylor, S. and Williams, M. (2002) A Quantitative analysis of Brazil's performances. Insight 3, 28-30.
Tenga, A., Holme, I., Ronglan, L. and Bahr, R. (2010) Effect of playing tactics on goal scoring in Norwegian professional soccer. J Sports Sci 28, 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903502766
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.