Possibilities of Olympic Legacy Rio 2016: A systematic review

Authors

  • Leonardo Perovano Camargo Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil
  • Otávio Guimarães Tavares da Silva Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc3.05

Keywords:

Politics, Sports, Education, Social conflicts

Abstract

In the last two decades Brazil has been the scene of several mega-sports events, putting it in evidence in the international scenario and culminating with the Rio 2016 Olympics. The methodology of this article is designed in the form of a systematic review. Thus, the question that guided this systematic review refers to the identification of central themes that guided the academic debate on legacies of sports mega-events, and the possibility to observe the variables. Through the systematic review technique, it was concluded, after reading and analyzing the selected articles, that these are the possibilities and dominant themes in the debate on legacies: multidisciplinarity, education, public health, inclusion, politics, social conflicts and environmental rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida B.S. (2016). Megaeventos esportivos, política e Legado: o Brasil como sede da Copa do Mundo Fifa 2014 e os Jogos Olímpicos e Paralímpicos Rio 2016. Espacio abierto. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-32892014000200012

Amaral et al (2014). A sociedade civil e os conflitos na construção dos megaeventos esportivos no Brasil. Sociedade e Estado. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-69922014000200015

Cordeiro, A..M.; Oliveira, G.M.; Renteria, J.M.; Guimarães, C.A (2007). Revisão sistemática: Uma revisão narrativa. Rev Col Bras Cir., GERSRio, p. 34 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69912007000600012

Demarzo et al (2014). Legado olímpico para o Brasil: questão de saúde pública? Cadernos de Saúde Pública. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311xpe010114

Gil, A.C. (2008). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6 ed. - São Paulo: Atlas.

Internacional Olympic Committee (2014). Olympic Agenda 2020 20+20 Recommendations. Lausanne: IOC.

Maturana, Leonardo (2014). Olympic education for what? Olympic education for whom? Representations and practices for critical pedagogy in special topics of olympism-the doping between school. Podium.

Mendes M.V.I. (2017). Paradiplomacy and the international competitiveness of cities: the case of Rio de Janeiro. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201700103

Pereira A.M. (2016). Legado Olímpico: uma herança multidisciplinar. Motricidade.

Tavares, Otavio (2011). Megaeventos Esportivos. Movimento, Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 3, p. 11-35, jul/set. 2011. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.23176

Toledo et al (2015). Megaeventos esportivos e seus Legados: uma análise dos efeitos institucionais da eleição do Brasil como país-sede. Revista de sociologia e política. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987315235602

Vila et al (2014). Olympic and paralympic games in Brazil: learning from Barcelona and Sydney. Revista de administração de empresas.

Vilani; Machado (2015). The impact of sports mega-events on health and environmental rights in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00047414

Villano, Bernardo et al (2008). Seminário “Gestão de Legados de Megaevento Esportivos”: Pontos de Convergência. In: Dacosta, Lamartine et al (Org.). Legados de megaeventos Esportivos. Brasília: Ministério do Esporte, p. 47-50. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8042.2013v25n41p42

Statistics

Statistics RUA

Published

2019-07-12

How to Cite

Camargo, L. P., & Tavares da Silva, O. G. (2019). Possibilities of Olympic Legacy Rio 2016: A systematic review. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 14(3proc), S321-S327. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc3.05