Novel way for FMS score calculation highlights field of sport- specific information among young competitive athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc4.34Keywords:
Functional Movement Screen, Sport-specific, Geometric meansAbstract
Any complex movement encompasses information about a person’s abilities and disabilities. FMS™ test includes such exercise tests that have shown to reflect risk for injury in the athletic population. There are few reports where FMS™ score reflects certain sports to be more prone to injury. The inconsistency of results may arise from the way subtest scores are combined. Instead of a summation we propose to apply more justified method of geometric mean of subtest scores to tally the final composite score. We used tests on 215 young competitive athletes, 133 young female (age 17.35 ± 1,65) and 82 males (age 17,78± 2.1) from 8 fields of sport (volleyball, basketball, handball, fencing, judo, biathlon, cycling, soccer). Original FMS 21 point (FMS21) were used and for every participant’s arithmetic and geometric mean were calculated. The mean composite FMS™ score of young female athletes was 14.3±1.7 and for male’s 13.8±1.6 out of possible 21 total point. The comparison of sport-specific geometric mean values among girls showed that basketball players had significantly lower results than athletes from biathlon and handball players. Contrarily among boys the handball players had lowest values, being significantly lower from in cyclists, fencers and soccer players. Cyclists had also higher geometric mean values than volleyball players and judo athletes. Detailed analysis of the structure of differences is needed to highlight the specific causes impacting FMS_GM for assessment for seriousness and for specific exercises to potentially compensate for the sport specific detrimental effect on the kinematic chain.
Downloads
References
Aquino, R., Puggina, E. F., Alves, I. S., & Garganta, J. (2017). Skill-related performance in soccer: A systematic review. Human Movement, 18(5), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/humo-2017-0042
Chaabene, H., Negra, Y., Bouguezzi, R., Capranica, L., Franchini, E., Prieske, O., ... & Granacher, U. (2018). Tests for the assessment of sport-specific performance in Olympic combat sports: a systematic review with practical recommendations. Frontiers in physiology, 9, 386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00386
Chapman, R. F., Laymon, A. S., & Arnold, T. (2014). Functional movement scores and longitudinal performance outcomes in elite track and field athletes. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 9(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2012-0329
Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006a). Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–part 1. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 1(2), 62.
Cook, G., Burton, L., & Hoogenboom, B. (2006b). Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–Part 2. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 1(3), 132.
Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014a). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy, 9(3), 396.
Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014b). Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 2. International journal of sports physical therapy, 9(4), 549.
Dorrel, B. S., Long, T., Shaffer, S., & Myer, G. D. (2015). Evaluation of the functional movement screen as an injury prediction tool among active adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports health, 7(6), 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738115607445
Girard, J., Quigley, M., & Helfst, F. (2016). Does the functional movement screen correlate with athletic performance? A systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, 21(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2016.1227568
Hickey, J. N., Barrett, B. A., Butler, R. J., Kiesel, K. B., & Plisky, P. J. (2010). Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen Using a 100-point Grading Scale: 1765Board# 202 June 2 2: 00 PM-3: 30 PM. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 42(5), 392. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000384722.43132.49
Kiesel, K., Plisky, P. J., & Voight, M. L. (2007). Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen?. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT, 2(3), 147.
Kraus, K., Doyscher, R., & Schüt, E. (2015). Methodological Item Analysis of the Functional Movement Screen. German Journal of Sports Medicine/Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Sportmedizin, 66(10). https://doi.org/10.5960/dzsm.2015.199
Kraus, K., Schütz, E., Taylor, W. R., & Doyscher, R. (2014). Efficacy of the functional movement screen: a review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(12), 3571-3584. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000556
Lockie, R. G., Schultz, A. B., Callaghan, S. J., Jordan, C. A., Luczo, T. M., & Jeffriess, M. D. (2015). A preliminary investigation into the relationship between functional movement screen scores and athletic physical performance in female team sport athletes. Biology of sport, 32(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1127281
McGill, S. M., Andersen, J. T., & Horne, A. D. (2012). Predicting performance and injury resilience from movement quality and fitness scores in a basketball team over 2 years. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(7), 1731-1739. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182576a76
Onate, J. A., Dewey, T., Kollock, R. O., Thomas, K. S., Van Lunen, B. L., DeMaio, M., & Ringleb, S. I. (2012). Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(2), 408-415. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318220e6fa
Parenteau-G, E., Gaudreault, N., Chambers, S., Boisvert, C., Grenier, A., Gagné, G., & Balg, F. (2014). Functional movement screen test: A reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players. Physical Therapy in Sport, 15(3), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.10.001
Pelot, T. & Darmiento, A. (2013). The FMS Screen and its Relevance within Elite Sport Performance. Olympic Coach;Winter, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p27.
Robertson, S. J., Burnett, A. F., & Cochrane, J. (2014). Tests examining skill outcomes in sport: a systematic review of measurement properties and feasibility. Sports Medicine, 44(4), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0131-0
Shultz, R., Anderson, S. C., Matheson, G. O., Marcello, B., & Besier, T. (2013). Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. Journal of athletic training, 48(3), 331-336. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.11
Smith, C. A., Chimera, N. J., Wright, N. J., & Warren, M. (2013). Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(4), 982-987. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182606df2
Smith, D. J. (2003). A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance. Sports medicine, 33(15), 1103-1126. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333150-00003
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
