Approaches to motor learning: Cognitive approach versus ecological dinamyc one
Keywords:Prescriptive teaching, Heuristic learning, Didactics exercise, Educational praxis, Affordances
The aim is to deepen the knowledge on the scientific evidence between the biomedical and pedagogical part and on the differences of the two approaches commonly used for teaching / learning processes: the cognitive and ecological-dynamic approach on one's own characteristics and specific paradigms. The retrieval of scientific literature took place through the use of specialized web research on: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, PMCfreearticle, CrossRef by PRISMA method. Motor learning is the stabilized execution of a given movement, executive technique, or gesture. It means that in the face of a number of repetitions most are performed correctly. Cognitive approach places the person at the centre of the teaching / learning process, neglecting the inferences that the surrounding environment produces. Ecological-dynamic approach, which considers motor coordination as an organization emerging from the peripheral constraints of the system rather than from central control structures, is defined as ecological, since it does not consider the aspects of motor coordination within the individual but, more generally, the complex interaction between the individual and the environment and the circular relationship between perception and action. The characteristics and paradigms of two approaches highlight two opposite ways to motor learning with an unsolved problem on which one is correct to use in physical education and sports performance.
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 3(2), 111-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898
Bernstein, N. (1966). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press; [1st English ed.].
Bernstein, N. A. (2014). Dexterity and its development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603357
Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305615
Chow, J. Y. (2013). Nonlinear learning underpinning pedagogy: evidence, challenges, and implications. Quest, 65(4), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.807746
Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.
Dhawale, A. K., Smith, M. A., & Ölveczky, B. P. (2017). The role of variability in motor learning. Annual review of neuroscience, 40, 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031548
D'Isanto, T., D'Elia, F., Raiola, G., & Altavilla, G. (2019). Assessment of sport performance: Theoretical aspects and practical indications. Sport Mont, 17(1), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.190214
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual review of psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Graser, J. V., Bastiaenen, C. H., & van Hedel, H. J. (2019). The role of the practice order: A systematic review about contextual interference in children. PloS one, 14(1), e0209979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209979
Haken, H., Kelso, J. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological cybernetics, 51(5), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336922
Hassler, R. (1978). Striatal control of locomotion, intentional actions and of integrating and perceptive activity. Journal of the neurological sciences, 36(2), 187-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(78)90082-5
Hastie, P., & Siedentop, D. (1999). An ecological perspective on physical education. European Physical Education Review, 5(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X990051002
Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 19(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x
Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological bulletin, 70(6p1), 387. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026739
Kelso, J. S. (1994). The informational character of self-organized coordination dynamics. Human Movement Science, 13(3-4), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(94)90047-7
Kerr, R., & Booth, B. (1978). Specific and varied practice of motor skill. Perceptual and motor skills, 46(2), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/003151257804600201
Komar, J., Potdevin, F., Chollet, D., & Seifert, L. (2019). Between exploitation and exploration of motor behaviours: Unpacking the constraints-led approach to foster nonlinear learning in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1557133
Lee, T. D., Swanson, L. R., & Hall, A. L. (1991). What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Physical therapy, 71(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/71.2.150
Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human movement science, 9(3-5), 241-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-X
Merbah, S., & Meulemans, T. (2011). Learning a motor skill: Effects of blocked versus random practice: A review. Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 15-48. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-51-1-15
Newell, K. M., Van Emmerik, R. E. A., & McDonald, P. V. (1989). Biomechanical constraints and action theory. Human Movement Science, 8(4), 403-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(89)90045-6
Raiola, G. (2014). Motor control and learning skills according to cognitive and ecological dynamic approach in a vision on behaviorism, cognitive, Gestalt and phenomenology theories. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), 504-504. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n15p504
Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis?. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902791586
Renshaw, I., Araújo, D., Button, C., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Moy, B. (2016). Why the constraints-led approach is not teaching games for understanding: A clarification. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095870
Renshaw, I., & Chow, J. Y. (2019). A constraint-led approach to sport and physical education pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1552676
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics.
Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7318.104.22.1686
Tomporowski, P. D., McCullick, B., Pendleton, D. M., & Pesce, C. (2015). Exercise and children's cognition: The role of exercise characteristics and a place for metacognition. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2014.09.003
Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological review, 113(2), 358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural networks, 11(7-8), 1317-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00066-5
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.