Performance differences between winning and losing basketball teams during close, balanced and unbalanced quarters

Gabor Csataljay, Nic James, Mike Hughes, Henriette Dancs

Abstract

Previous studies in basketball performance have tended to assess differences between winners and losers of games. This methodology does not consider the fluctuating nature of scoring within games. Consequently winning and losing performance for each quarter of 26 games of the Hungarian basketball league in 2007/08 were compared with the difference in points scored used as an independent variable with three levels (identified through cluster analysis as close (1 to 5 points), balanced (6 to 11 points) and unbalanced periods (12 to 22 points)). Wilcoxon signed ranks tests identified significant differences between winning and losing quarter performance for 20 performance indicators when all quarters were analysed (n = 100) in comparison to just 5 for close quarters only (n = 42). The five performance indicators (number of successful free throws, number of defensive rebounds, total amount of rebounds and rebounding percentage in offence and defence) suggest that mainly the success in rebounding might be the critical factor that determines winning and losing in these close situations. Kruskal Wallis H tests and Mann Whitney U post-hoc tests revealed differences between winning performances from close, balanced and unbalanced quarters for the 3 point performance (number of successful 3 point shots, number of 3 point attempts and 3 point shooting performance), the number of assist passes and turnovers; these findings could be explained by the significantly different features of defensive resistance during different types of periods.

Keywords

Performance indicators; Score differences; Score fluctuation

References

Bartlett, R. Performance analysis: can bringing together biomechanics and notational analysis benefit coaches? International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2001; 1(1):122-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2001.11868254

Choi, H., O`Donoghue, P., Hughes, M.D. A study of team performance indicators by separated time scale using a real-time analysis within English national basketball league. In: H. Dancs, M.D. Hughes & O`Donoghue, P. (Eds.), World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport VII. Book of Proceedings. 2006; 138-141. Cardiff: UWIC.

Csataljay, G., O'Donoghue, P., Hughes, M.D., Dancs, H. Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2009; 9(1):60-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868464

Csataljay, G., Hughes, M.D., James, N., Dancs, H. Pace as an influencing factor in basketball. In: M.D. Hughes, H. Dancs, K. Nagyvaradi, T. Polgar, N. James, G. Vuckovic (Eds.), Research Methods and Performance Analysis. 2011; 178-187. University of West Hungary. Institute of Sport Science, Szombathely.

Dezman, B., Erculj, F., Vuckovic, G. Differences between winning and losing teams in playing efficiency. Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. 2002; 7(Supplement):71-74.

Hughes, M.D., Bartlett, R.M. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2002; 20:739-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320675602

Hughes, M.D., Franks, I.M. Notational analysis of sport. Second edition. Systems for better coaching and performance in sport. London and New York: Routledge. 2004.

Ibá-ez, S.J., Sampaio, J., Sáenz-López, P., Jiménez, J., Janeira, M.A. Game statistics discriminating the final outcome of junior world basketball championship matches (Portugal 1999). Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2003; 74:1-19.

Mendez, L., Janeira, M. Basketball performance - multivariate study in Portuguese professional male basketball teams. In: M.D. Hughes & F. Tavares (Eds.), Notational Analysis of sport – IV. 2001; 103 111. Cardiff: UWIC.

O'Donoghue, P. Research methods for sport performance analysis. New York:Routledge. 2010.

Oliver, D. Basketball on paper – Rules and tools for performance analysis. Washington, D.C.: Brassey's Inc. 2004.

Reano, G.M.A., Calvo, L.A., Toro, O.E. Differences between winning and losing under-16 male basketball teams. In: H. Dancs, M.D. Hughes & P. O'Donoghue (Eds.), World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport VII – Book of Proceedings. 142-149. Cardiff: UWIC. 2006.

Sampaio, J., Janeira, M. Statistical analyses of basketball team performance: understanding teams' wins and losses according to a different index of ball possessions. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2003; 3(1):40-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2003.11868273

Sampaio, J., Godoy, S.I., Feu, S. Discriminative power of basketball game-related statistics by level of competition and sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2004; 99:1231-8. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.99.3f.1231-1238

Sterbenz, T. The rational game. FIBA Assist Magazine. 2006; 20:20-21.

Tavares, F., Gomes, N. The offensive process in basketball - a study in high performance junior teams. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2003; 3(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2003.11868272

Trninic, S., Dizdar, D., Luksic, E. Differences between winning and defeated top quality basketball teams in final of European club championship. Collegium Antropologicum. 2002; 26(2):521-31.

Tsamourtzis, E., Salonikidis, K., Taxildaris, K., Mawromatis, G. Technic and tactical characteristics of winners and losers in basketball. Leistungssport. 2002; 1:54-58.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2012.72.02