Rio 2016 Olympics: Urban regeneration and social legacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.13.Proc1.10Keywords:
OLYMPIC GAMES, LEGACY, CLUSTER, DEODORO, MARACANÃ, COPACABANA, BARRA, OLYMPIC PARK, RIO 2016Abstract
This study aimed to analyse the changes occurred in the urban space in the city of Rio de Janeiro face the Rio 2016 Games. In order to achieve this goal, official documents (bid, the organizing committee, and the legacy plan), official websites and newspapers websites with national and international coverage were analysed. This revealed the Olympic Games worked as catalyser to urban regeneration, mainly in "Porto Maravilha" and the surrounding area to Deodoro X-Park and, the great expansion to transport system, improving the urban mobility, linking all the Rio de Janeiro regions. Consequently, the social legacy appeared mainly in the Deodoro X-Park area, where there was no leisure in public area. Moreover, through improvements made in mobility brought another social aspect linked to the Games. Thus, it is true that the Olympics works as a catalyser to urban space, but not always it is happening in a meaningful, depending exclusively on own governments and a realistic planning for the city.
Downloads
References
Abreu, M. (1988) Evolução Urbana do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Iplanrio/Jorge Zahar Editor.
Aguiar, J. E. (1995, June 11). Brasil terá, em março, prova em circuito oval. O Estado de São Paulo, p.E9.
Andreatta, V. (2006) Cidades quadradas, paraísos circulares. Os planos urbanísticos do Rio de Janeiro no século XIX. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad.
APO (2016). Planejamento de Uso do Legado. Rio de Janeiro. 2016.
Autódromo carioca terá o circuito invertido. (1974, July 12). O Globo, p.10.
Brasil (2007). Relatório sobre os XV Jogos Pan-Americanos e III Jogos Parapan-Americanos Rio 2007. Brasília: Governo Federal.
Brasil (2015, December 23). Legado antecipado: Parque Radical do Rio, em Deodoro, é aberto à população. Retrieved from: http://www.brasil2016.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/legado-antecipado-parque-radical-do-rio-em-deodoro-e-aberto-a-populacao.
Burbank, M. J.; Andronovich, G.; & Heying, C. H. (2002) Mega-events, urban development and public policy. The Review of Policy Research, 19(3), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00301.x
Cabernet (2006). Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Carvalho, P.A.M. (2008). Mário Filho, futebol e Maracanã. Monografia Graduação em Comunicação Social. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Chappelet, J. L. (2012). Mega sporting event legacies: a multifaceted concept. Papeles de Europa, 25, 76.
Chimento, M.R. (2016). A retórica da perda e a questão do patrimônio no futebol padrão Fifa: o caso do Maracanã. Geosaberes, 7(12), 104-118.
Clark, J., & Kearns, A. (2015). Pathways to a physical activity legacy: Assessing the regeneration potential of multi-sport events using a prospective approach. Local Economy, 30(8), 888-909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215601993
Clark, J., Kearns, A., & Cleland, C. (2016). Spatial scale, time and process in mega-events: The complexity of host community perspectives on neighbourhood change. Cities, 53, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.012
Coaffee, J. (2011) Urban regeneration and renewal. In: Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M. (ed.) Olympic cities: city agendas, planning, and the World's Games 1896-2016 (pp.180-193). London, Routledge.
CO-RIO (2007). Relatório Oficial XV Jogos Pan-Americanos e III Jogos Parapan-Americanos Rio 2007. 2 Vol.
CO-RIO (2009). Candidature file for Rio de Janeiro to host the 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Rio de Janeiro: Bid Commission Rio 2016.
Confederação Brasileira de Canoagem (2017, September 22). Legado olímpico é reaberto depois de nove meses. Retrieved from: http://www.canoagem.org.br/imprensa/noticia/titulo/legado_olimpico_e_reaberto_depois_de_nove_meses/paginas_id/166/noticias_id/3124.
FGV Social (2016). Mudança Social Carioca 2009-2016: o legado pré-olímpico. Retrieved from: http://www.fgv.br/fgvsocial/rio2016.
GP de moto: Contrato para a prova do Rio é assinado. (1995, January 12). O Globo, p. 35.
Gold J. R., & Gold M. M. (2011) From a to b: The summer Olympics 1896–2008. In: Gold, J. R, Gold, M. M. (eds) Olympic Cities 1896–2016, 2nd ed. (pp. 17-54). London: Routledge.
Goppert, K., Stockhusen, K., & Moschner, T. (2014). Estádio Jornalista Mário Filho, Rio de Janeiro. Stahlbau, 83, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.201410163
Greater London Authority. (2012). Leaving a transport legacy 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/leaving-a-transport-legacy.pdf
Greene, S. J. (2003). Staged cities: Mega-events, slum clearance, and global capital. Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. 6, 161.
Heere, B., Walker, M., Heather, G., Thapa, B., Geldenhuys, S., & Coetzee, W. (2013). The power of sport to unite a nation: The social value of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(4), 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2013.809136
Hollanda, B.B., & Medeiros, J. (2014). Do 'Colosso do 'Derby' a 'Arena do Maracanã': a cidade, o estádio e as percepções dos torcedores de futebol sobre a Copa do Mundo 2014. Interseções: Revista de Estudos Interdisciplinares, 16(2), 328-353. https://doi.org/10.12957/irei.2014.16594
IBGE (2012). Censo demográfico 2010: características gerais da população, religião e pessoas com deficiência. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1-215.
Johson, I., & Aguiar, P. R. (2016). A Revitalização Urbana e a Infraestrutura de Transportes como Formas de Legado dos Jogos Rio 2016 In: XIII Congresso Online – Administração. Retrieved from: http://www.convibra.com.br/upload/paper/2016/38/2016_38_13322.pdf
Kaplanidou K., Karadakis K. (2010). Understanding the Legacies of a Host Olympic City: The Case of the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19(2), 110-117.
Magalhães, L. E. (2011, April 25). Parque Olímpico terá concurso internacional. O Globo, Rio, pp.16.
Marker, A. (2003). A reabilitação de áreas urbanas degradadas. Políticas, instrumentos e incentivos no cenário internacional. ProGAU: São Paulo, 2003. Retrieved from: ww2.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/arquivos/.../rel_marker_01_08_2003.doc
Mascarenhas, G. (2008). Barcelona 1992: um modelo em questão. In DaCosta, L., Corrêa, D., Rizzuti, E., Villano, B., Miragaya, A. Legados de megaeventos esportivos. Brasília: Ministério do Esporte.
Mello, J. O. B. (2012) A cidade, o urbanista e o plano. Um estudo para a Guanabara por Doxiadis. Monografia de especialização em Sociologia Urbana. Rio de Janiero: UERJ. Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas.
Moura, D., Guerra, I., Seixas, J., & Freitas, M. J. A. (2006). Revitalização Urbana Contributos para a Definição de um Conceito Operativo. Cidades-Comunidades e Territórios. 12/13, 15-34.
Nogueira, C. (2005, February 18). Rio perde GP de moto. O Globo, p. 31.
Nogueira, C., & Barreto, M. (1995, September 15). Festa para o motociclismo. O Globo, p. 32.
Nogueira, C., & Magalhães, L. E. (2005, July 26). Acelera, autódromo. O Globo, Rio, p.13.
Obras do autódromo de Jacarepaguá devem ser aceleradas. (1975, January 28). O Globo, p. 16.
Pinheiro, A. I. F., & Rabha, N. M. C. E. (2004). Porto do Rio de Janeiro: construindo a modernidade. Rio de Janeiro: Andrea Jakobsson Estúdio.
Porto Maravilha (2017). Porto Maravilha. Retrieved from: http://www.portomaravilha.com.br
Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. (2011). Porto Maravilha. Retrieved from: http://www.portomaravilhario.com.br.
Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. (2016). Rio 2016. Olympic and Legacy. Retrieved from: http://www.rio.rj.gov.br/dlstatic/10112/4379008/4129850/RIO2016_estudos_ING.pdf
Preuss, H. (2007). The conceptualisation and measurement of mega sport event legacies. Journal of sport & tourism, 12(3-4), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080701736957
Preuss, T., & Ferber, U. (2008). Circular land use management in cities and urban regions: a policy mix utilizing existing and newly conceived instruments to implement an innovative strategic and policy approach. Berlim: Deutsches Institut fuer Urbanistik.
Proni, M. W. (2010). Observações sobre os impactos econômicos esperados dos Jogos Olímpicos de 2016. Motrivivência, Florianópolis, 32-33, 49-70.
Rangel, S. (2017, August 06). Após Rio-2016, Parque Radical de Deodoro tem água suja e parada. Folha de São Paulo. Retrieved from: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/esporte/2017/08/1907552-um-anos-apos-abertura-das-olimpiadas-parque-radical-de-deodoro.shtml.
Reis, A. C., Sousa-Mast, F. R., & Gurgel, L. A. (2013). Rio 2016 and the sport participation legacies. Leisure Studies, 33(5) 437–453
Rezende, V. L. F. M. (2014) Planos, regulação urbanística e intervenções no Rio de Janeiro: diferenças entre pensar e produzir a cidade. III Encontro da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Arquitetura, cidade e projeto: uma construção coletiva. São Paulo.
Rio está no calendário da F-Indy em 96. (1995, June 11). O Globo, p. 63.
Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban regeneration: a handbook. Londres: Sage.
Rodrigues, A. E. M., & Mello, J. O. B. (2015). As reformas urbanas na cidade do Rio de Janeiro: uma história de contrastes. Acervo, Rio de Janeiro, 28(1), 19-53.
Sant, S. L., & Mason, D. S. (2015). Framing event legacy in a prospective host city: Managing Vancouver's Olympic bid. Journal of Sport Management, 29(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.2013-0294
Santos, T., Correia, A., Biscaia, R., Araújo, C., Pedroso, C., Stinghen, F., ... Menezes, V. (2016). A qualidade da copa do mundo da FIFA Brasil 2014 nas cidades-sede. Movimento, 22(2), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.57028
Santos Neto, S. C., Nóbrega, L. F. M., Dacosta, L. P., Haiachi, M. C., & Terezani, D. R. (2016). Legado esportivo e social Rio 2016: o estádio Olímpico de canoagem slalom. III Fórum Científico EsEFEx.
Soares, P. R. R. (2013). Megaeventos esportivos e o urbano: a copa do mundo de 2014 e seus impactos nas cidades brasileiras. Revista FSA, 10(4), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.12819/2013.10.4.11
Taks, M., Chalip, L., & Gree, C. (2015). Impacts and strategic outcomes from non-mega sport events for local communities. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2014.995116
Terezani, D. R. (2017) Das corredeiras do estádio Olímpico de canoagem slalom ao conjunto aquático do Parque Radical: as conquistas e os desafios do complexo esportivo de Deodoro, a segunda maior área de lazer da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. In: Oliveira, A.F.S.; Haiachi, M.C. (Org.). IV Ciclo de Debates em Estudos Olímpicos - Diferentes olhares sobre os Jogos Olímpicos e Paralímpicos Rio 2016: a mídia, os profissionais, os voluntários e os espectadores. 1ed. São Cristóvão: Editora UFS.
Toledo, M. P. (2012). Participação de instituições locais em projetos de revitalização urbana: o caso do Projeto Porto Maravilha na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Dissertação de Mestrado, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Rio de Janeiro.
Urbe Carioca (2016, April 14). O "não-legado" do Estádio de Remo da Lagoa Rodrigo de Freitas. Retrieved from http://urbecarioca.com.br/2016/04/o-nao-legado-do-estadio-de-remo-da-lagoa-rodrigo-de-freitas.html.
Yin, R. (2015). Estudo de caso. Planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
