The influence of analogies on the development of selective attention in novices in normal or stressful conditions
Keywords:Perceptual skills, Information processing, Analogy learning, Implicit learning, Explicit learning, Performance analysis of sport
The effect of explicit, implicit, and analogy learning methods on developing selective attention skills in young novice participants was examined under normal and stressful conditions. The 60 novice participants, aged 11-12 years old, followed a video simulation intervention program of 12 sessions (3 times * 4 weeks). They were tested four times (pre-test, post-test, retention, and stress test) to evaluate their reaction time and accuracy in selective attention skills. The differences among the groups and the measurements were analysed using a two-way mixed factorial ANOVA (4 groups * 4 measurements), and post-hoc Bonferroni evaluated significant differences among the groups. The results showed that all three experimental groups improved their performance in response reaction time and accuracy from the pre-test to the post-test and maintained their scores on the retention test. However, the analogy group had the best scores, followed by the implicit group, and they were both better than the explicit group. According to the stress test, the analogy and the implicit group remained unaffected while the explicit group showed a decrease in both reaction time and accuracy. Training by analogy was more effective in improving selective attention in novices in both normal and stressful conditions. Analogy learners probably developed an advanced mechanism that allowed them to quickly and accurately select the most useful information from the sport setting even in stressful conditions. This research highlights the advantages of simulation techniques; future research may assess selective attention in real conditions.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci, 4(10), 829-839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
Behan, M., & Wilson, M. (2008). State anxiety and visual attention: The role of the quiet eye period in aiming to a far target. J Sport Sci, 26(2), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701446919
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?. J Exp Psychol: General, 130(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34188.8.131.521
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2004). 14. From novice to expert performance. In: A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 309-328). Routledge.
Bennett, S. J. (2000). Implicit learning: Should it be used in practice?. In Scientific Sport Psychology Workshop, Nov. 1997, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Edizioni Luigi Pozzi.
Buszard, T., Farrow, D., Zhu, F. F., & Masters, R. S. (2016). The relationship between working memory capacity and cortical activity during performance of a novel motor task. Psychol Sport Exerc, 22, 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.07.005
Davids, K., Williams, A.M., Button, C, and Court, M (2001). An integrative modeling approach to the study of intentional movement behavior. In: R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. Janelle, (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 144-173). 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Englert, C., & Oudejans, R. R. (2014). Is choking under pressure a consequence of skill-focus or increased distractibility? Results from a tennis serve task. Psychology, 5(9), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.59116
Ewolds, H. E., Bröker, L., De Oliveira, R. F., Raab, M., & Künzell, S. (2017). Implicit and explicit knowledge both improve dual task performance in a continuous pursuit tracking task. Front Psychol, 8, 2241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02241
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognit Emot, 6(6), 409-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-35184.108.40.2066
Gentner, D., & Forbus, K. D. (2011). Computational models of analogy. Wires Cogn Sci, 2(3), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.105
Gotardi, G. C., Polastri, P. F., Schor, P., Oudejans, R. R., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J., ... & Rodrigues, S. T. (2019). Adverse effects of anxiety on attentional control differ as a function of experience: A simulated driving study. Applied Ergonomics, 74, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.009
Gröpel, P., & Mesagno, C. (2019). Choking interventions in sports: A systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exer P, 12(1), 176-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1408134
Hayes, S., Hirsch, C., & Mathews, A. (2008). Restriction of working memory capacity during worry. J Abnorm Psychol, 117(3), 712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012908
Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., Coles, M. G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. J Exp Psychol: General, 134(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.11
Jackson, R. C., & Farrow, D. (2005). Implicit perceptual training: How, when, and why?. Hum Movement Sci, 24(3), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.003
Janelle, C. M., & Hillman, C. H. (2003). Expert performance in sport. Current perspectives and critical issues. In J. L. Starkes & K.A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert Performance In Sports: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise (pp. 19-47). Human Kinetics.
Kleynen, M., Braun, S. M., Bleijlevens, M. H., Lexis, M. A., Rasquin, S. M., Halfens, J., ... & Masters, R. S. (2014). Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PLoS One, 9(6), e100227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annu Rev Neurosci, 30, 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256
Koedijker, J. M., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Oudejans, R. R., Beek, P. J., & Masters, R. S. (2011). Attention and time constraints in perceptual-motor learning and performance: Instruction, analogy, and skill level. Conscious Cogn, 20(2), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.08.002
Komar, J., Chow, J. Y., Chollet, D., & Seifert, L. (2014). Effect of analogy instructions with an internal focus on learning a complex motor skill. J Appl Sport Psychol, 26(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2013.771386
Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. (2009). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skills under pressure. J Sport Exercise Psy, 31(3), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.337
Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. S. W. (2009). Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. J Sport Sci, 27(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802448764
Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. S. W. (2010). Probing the allocation of attention in implicit (motor) learning. J Sport Sci, 28(14), 1543-1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.517543
Law, J., Masters, R., Bray, S. R., Eves, F., & Bardswell, I. (2003). Motor performance as a function of audience affability and metaknowledge. J Sport Exercise Psy, 25(4), 484-500. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.4.484
Lee, T.D., Chamberlin, C.J., Hodges, N.J. (2001). Practice. In: R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. Jannelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (pp. 115-143). 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Lewis, B. P., & Linder, D. E. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Per Soc Psychol B, 23(9), 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297239003
Liao, C. M., & Masters, R. S. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. J Sport Sci, 19(5), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410152006081
Lohse, K. R., Wulf, G., & Ite, R. L. W. (2012). Attentional focus affects movement efficiency. In Skill Acquisition in Sport (pp. 66-84). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203133712-12
Lola, A., Koutsomarkou, A., & Tzetzis, G. (2021). Effective methods of developing simple or complex perceptual-motor skills in children. Interciencia Journal, 46(3), in press.
Lola, A., Koutsomarkou, A., & Tzetzis, G. (2021). Influence of different focus of attention instructions on learning volleyball skills for young novices. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 17(4), in press. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.174.14
Lola A., & Tzetzis, G. (2020). Analogy versus explicit and implicit learning of a volleyball skill for novices: The effect on motor performance and self-efficacy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20, 2478 - 2486.
Lola A., Tzetzis G., & Zetou E. (2012). The effect of implicit and explicit practice in the development of decision making in volleyball serving. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.23.25.PMS.114.2.665-678
Lola, A. C., & Tzetzis, G. C. (2021). The effect of explicit, implicit and analogy instruction on decision making skill for novices, under stress. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1877325
MacMahon, K., & Masters, R. S. (2002). The effects of secondary tasks on implicit motor skill performance. Int J Sport Psychol, 33, 307-324.
Martens, R., Vealey, R. and Burton, D. (1990). Competitive Anxiety in Sport. Human Kinetics.
Masters, R. S. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. Brit J Psychol, 83(3), 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.x
Masters, R. S. (2000). Theoretical aspects of implicit learning in sport. Int J Sport Psychol, 31(4), 530-541.
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2003). The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious Cogn, 12(3), 376-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00005-9
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S., & Eves, F. F. (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. J Sport Sci, 18(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404100365180
Memmert, D. (2009). Pay attention! A review of visual attentional expertise in sport. Int Rev Sport Exer P, 2(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802641372
Neumann, O. (1984). 17. Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In: W. Prinz & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and Motor Processes, 255-293. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_17
Ong, N. T. T., Bowcock, A., & Hodges, N. J. (2010). Manipulations to the timing and type of instructions to examine motor skill performance under pressure. Front Psychol, 1, 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00196
Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Hum Movement Sci, 24(3), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.006
Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S., & Maxwell, J. P. (2006). The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data. Psychol Sport Exerc 7(6), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.005
Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S., & Maxwell, J. P. (2007). Passing thoughts on the evolutionary stability of implicit motor behaviour: Performance retention under physiological fatigue. Conscious Cogn, 16(2), 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.06.008
Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Raab, M. (2006). Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing?. J Sport Sci, 24(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500130854
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. J Pers Soc Psychol, 85(3), 440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1680
Smeeton, N. J., Williams, A. M., Hodges, N. J., & Ward, P. (2005). The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. J Exp Psychol-Appl, 11(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.98
Tsorbatzoudis, H., Barkoukis, V., Kaissidis-Rodafinos, A., & Grouios, G. (1998). A test of the reliability and factorial validity of the Greek version of the CSAI-2. Res Q Exercise Sport, 69(4), 416-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1998.10607717
Tzetzis G., & Lola A. (2010). The role of implicit, explicit instruction, and their combination in learning anticipation skill, under normal and stress conditions. International Journal of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, 1, 54-59.
Uehara, L. A., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2008). The effects of focus of attention instructions on novices learning soccer chip. Braz J Biomotricity, 2(1), 63-77.
van der Graaff, E., Hoozemans, M., Pasteuning, M., Veeger, D., & Beek, P. J. (2018). Focus of attention instructions during baseball pitching training. Int J Sport Sci Coach, 13(3), 391-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954117711095
Van der Kamp, J., Oudejans, R., & Savelsbergh, G. (2003). The development and learning of the visual control of movement: An ecological perspective. Infant Behav Dev, 26(4), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.09.002
Vickers, J. N., & Williams, A. M. (2007). Performing under pressure: The effects of physiological arousal, cognitive anxiety, and gaze control in biathlon. J Motor Behav, 39(5), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.39.5.381-394
Votsis, E., Tzetzis, G., Hatzitaki, V., & Grouios, V. G. (2009). The effect of implicit and explicit methods in acquisition of anticipation skill in low and high complexity situations. Int J Sport Psychol, 40(3), 374-391.
Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Chapman, C. (2003). Training perceptual skill in field hockey: Is there transfer from the laboratory to the field?. Res Q Exercise Sport, 74(1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609068
Wilson, M. R., Vine, S. J., & Wood, G. (2009). The influence of anxiety on visual attentional control in basketball free throw shooting. J Sport Exercise Psy, 31(2), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.2.152
Wood, G., & Wilson, M. R. (2010). A moving goalkeeper distracts penalty takers and impairs shooting accuracy. J Sport Sci, 28(9), 937-946. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.495995
Wulf, G. (2007). Attention and motor skill learning. Human Kinetics. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781492596844
Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exer P, 6(1), 77-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In: B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in attention and action (pp. 75-101). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262013840.003.0004
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.