Traditional vs daily undulling periodization in strength and local muscle endurance gains on trained men
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2018.132.11Keywords:
Resistance training, Muscle strength, Muscle enduranceAbstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different periodization models on strength and local muscle endurance. Twenty trained men (25.45 ± 2.984 years, 75.34 ± 6.05 kg, 177.25 ± 4.92 cm, 23.96 ± 1.64 kg . m-2) were randomly assigned in two groups: undulling periodization (UPG) and traditional periodization group (TPG), respectively. All the subjects performed one repetition maximum (1-RM) strength test and a local muscle endurance test (60% of 1-RM to failure) before, during and after experimental period. The UPG executed 30 workout sessions with daily modifications regarding intensity, volume and rest period length. The TGP was divided into 3 phases (10 workout sessions in each phase) with the same changes executed by the other group in distinct methodological variables (intensity, volume and rest period length). After the ANCOVA analysis, no significant differences were found in both maximum strength attempts, bench press (p = 0.878) and triceps pull-down (p = 0.967). The same results occurred for local muscular endurance on the bench press (p = 0.777) or triceps pull-down (p = 0.494). However, the effect size presented moderate post-test strength gains (ESs = 0,352) and local muscular endurance (ESs = 0.367). Our results indicated that daily undulling periodization seems to be more influent in increasing muscular strength and local muscular endurance according to effect size evidence.Downloads
References
American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). Position stand on progression models in resistance exercise for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 41, 687–708.
Apel, J.M., Lacey, R.M., Kell, R.T. (2011). A comparison of traditional and weekly undulating periodized strength training programs with total volume and intensity equated. J Strength Cond Res, 25, 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c69ef6
Baechle, T.R. and Earle, R.W. (2000). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Baker, D., Wilson, G., Carlyon, R. (1994). Periodization: The effect on strength of manipulating volume and intensity. J Strength Cond Res, 8, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199411000-00006
Bartolomei, S., Hoffman, J.R., Merni, F., Stout, J.R. (2014). A comparison of traditional ad block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 28, 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000366
Bufford, T.W., Rossi, S.J., Smith, DB., Warren, A.J. (2007). A comparison of periodization models during nine weeks with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res, 21, 1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200711000-00045
Campos, G.E., Luecke, T.J., Wendeln, H.K., Toma, K., Hagerman, F.C., Murray, T.F., Ragg, K.E., Ratamess, N.A., Kraemer, W.J., Staron, R.S. (2002). Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol, 88, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
de Lima, C., Boullosa, D.A., Frollini, A.B., Donatto, F.F., Leite, R.D., Gonelli, P.R., Montebello, M.I., Prestes, J., Cesar, M.C. (2012). Linear and daily undulating resistance training periodizations have differential beneficial effects in young sedentary women. Int J Sports Med, 33, 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1306324
Franchini, E., Branco, B.M., Agostinho, M.F., Calmet, M., Candau, R. (2015). Influence of linear and undulating strength periodization on physical fitness, physiological and performance responses to simulated Judo matches. J Strength Cond Res, 29, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000460
Goto, K., Nagasawa, M., Yanagisawa, O., Kizuka, T., Ishii, N. and Takamatsu, K. (2004). Muscular adaptations to combinations of high-and low-intensity resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res, 18, 730-737. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200411000-00008
Hoffman, J.R., Wendell, M., Cooper, J., Kang, J. (2003). Comparison between linear and nonlinear in-season training program in freshman football players. J Strength Cond Res, 17, 561–565. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200308000-00023
Kraemer, W.J., Ratamess, N.A. (2004) Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 36, 674-688. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000121945.36635.61
Mangine, G.T., Hoffman, J.R., Gonzalez, A.M., Townsend, J.R., Wells, A.J., Jajtner, A.R., Beyer, K.S., Boone, C.H., Miramonti, A.A., Wang, R., La Monica, M.B., Fukuda, H.D., Ratamess, N.A., Stout, J.R. (2015). The effect of training volume and intensity on improvements in muscular strength and size in resistance‐trained men. Physiol Rep, 3, e12472. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12472
McNair, P.J., Depledge, J., Brettkelly, M., Stanley, S.N. (1996). Verbal encouragement: Effect on maximum effort voluntary muscle action. Brit J Sports Med, 30, 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.30.3.243
Miranda, F., Simão, R., Rhea, M., Bunker, D., Prestes, J., Leite, R.D., Miranda, H., de Salles, B.F., Novaes, J. (2011). Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains. J Strength Cond Res, 25, 1824–1830. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e7ff75
Monteiro, A.G., Aoki, M.S., Evangelista, A.L., Alveno, D.A., Monteiro, A.G., Picarro Ida, C., Ugrinowitsch, C. (2009). Nonlinear periodization maximizes strength gains in split resistance training routines. J Strength Cond Res, 23, 1321-1326. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a00f96
Painter, K.B., Haff, G.G., Ramsey, M.W., McBride, J., Triplett, T., Sands, W.A., Lamont, H.S., Stone, M.E., Stone, M.H. (2012). Strength gains: Block vs Dup weight training among track and field athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 7, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.7.2.161
Peterson, M.D., Dodd, D.J., Alvar, B.A., Rhea, M.R., Favre, M. (2008) Undulation training for development of hierarchical fitness and improved firefighter job performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22, 1683-1695. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818215f4
Prestes, J., De Lima, C., Frollini, A.B., Donatto, F.F., Conte, M. (2009). Comparison of linear and reverse linear periodization effects on maximal strength and body composition. J Strength Cond Res, 29, 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181874bf3
Prestes, J., Frollini, A.B., De Lima, C., Donatto, F.F., Foschini, D., Marqueti, R.C., Figueira Jr, A., Fleck, SJ. (2009). Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength. J Strength Cond Res, 23, 2437–2442. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c03548
Rhea, M.R., Ball, S.D., Phillips, W.T., Burkett, L.N. (2002). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res, 16, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200205000-00013
Rhea, M.R., Phillips, W.T., Burkett, L.N., Stone, W.J., Ball, S.D., Alvar, B.A., Thomas, A.B. (2003). A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. J Strength Cond Res, 17, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200302000-00014
Schoenfeld, B.J., Peterson, M.D., Ogborn, D., Contreras, B., Sonmez, G.T. (2015). Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res, 29, 2954-2963. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000958
Scudese, E., Willardson, J.M., Simão, R., de Salles, B.F., Senna, G., Miranda, H. (2015). The effect of rest interval length on repetition consistency and perceived exertion during near maximal loaded bench press sets. J Strength Cond Res, 29, 3079-3083. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSC.0000000000000214
Senna, G., Willardson, J.M., de Salles, B.F., Scudese, E., Palma, A., Simão, R. (2011). The effect of rest interval length on multi and single-joint exercise performance and perceived exertion. J Strength Cond Res, 25, 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e23b
Senna, G., Willardson, J.M., Scudese, E., Simão, R., Queiroz, C., Avelar, R., Dantas, E.H.M. (2016). Effect of different interest rest intervals on performance of single and multijoint exercises with near-maximal loads. J Strength Cond Res, 30, 710-716. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001142
Shephard, R.J. (1988). Par-Q, Canadian Home Fitness Test and exercise screening alternatives. Sports Med, 5, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198805030-00005
Simão, R., Spineti, J., de Salles, B.F., Matta, T., Fernandes, L., Fleck, S.J., Rhea, M.R., Strom-Olsen, H.E. (2012). Comparison between nonlinear and linear periodized resistance training: hypertrophic and strength effects. J Strength Cond Res, 26, 1389–1395. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318231a659
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Each author warrants that his or her submission to the Work is original and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this Work nor a similar work has been published elsewhere in any language nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by JHSE. Each author also accepts that the JHSE will not be held legally responsible for any claims of compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright holder(s) and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please include at the end of the acknowledgements a declaration that the experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the abovementioned requirements. The author(s) will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
This title is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Transfer of Copyright
In consideration of JHSE’s publication of the Work, the authors hereby transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership worldwide, in all languages, and in all forms of media now or hereafter known, including electronic media such as CD-ROM, Internet, and Intranet, to JHSE. If JHSE should decide for any reason not to publish an author’s submission to the Work, JHSE shall give prompt notice of its decision to the corresponding author, this agreement shall terminate, and neither the author nor JHSE shall be under any further liability or obligation.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article, except as disclosed on a separate attachment. All funding sources supporting the Work and all institutional or corporate affiliations of the authors are acknowledged in a footnote in the Work.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the protocol for any investigation involving humans or animals and that all experimentation was conducted in conformity with ethical and humane principles of research.
Competing Interests
Biomedical journals typically require authors and reviewers to declare if they have any competing interests with regard to their research.
JHSE require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process.
